Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 19;24(3):e12626. doi: 10.1111/anec.12626

Table 2.

Association between vitamin D categories and P wave duration

Logistic regression modelsa
Vitamin D categories Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Odds ratio (95% CI) p‐Value Odds ratio (95% CI) p‐Value Odds ratio (95% CI) p‐Value
Vitamin D ≥30 ng/ml Reference Reference Reference
Vitamin D 20–29 ng/ml 1.16 (0.99–1.35) 0.05 1.09 (0.93 to 1.27) 0.25 1.10 (0.94 to 1.29) 0.21
Vitamin D <20 ng/ml 1.35 (1.14–1.58) 0.001 1.20 (1.02 to 1.42) 0.04 1.22 (1.03 to 1.45) 0.02
Linear regression modelsb
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Beta‐coefficient (95% CI) p‐Value Beta‐coefficient (95% CI) p‐Value Beta‐coefficient (95% CI) p‐Value
Vitamin D ≥30 ng/ml Reference Reference Reference
Vitamin D 20–29 ng/ml 1.00 (0.20–1.80) 0.01 0.58 (−0.20 to 1.38) 0.14 0.61 (−0.18 to 1.41) 0.12
Vitamin D <20 ng/ml 2.03 (1.19–2.88) <0.0001 1.25 (0.40 to 2.11) 0.003 1.19 (0.33 to 2.05) 0.006

Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status.

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 plus smoking and physical activity, BMI, and alcohol use.

Model 3 adjusted for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, insulin resistance, total cholesterol, CRP, serum phosphorus, eGFR, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio.

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

a

Odds ratio and 95% CI calculated using multivariable regression analysis.

b

Beta‐coefficient and 95% CI calculated using multivariable linear regression analysis.