Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 6;202(1):e00567-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00567-19

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Comparisons between CC101 ΔmutT ΔribA and CC101 ΔmutT ΔribA Δndk strains. Panels A and B represent two independent comparisons of Lac+ reversion frequencies. Reversion frequencies were obtained by dividing the number of Lac+ revertants by the respective viable counts. (C) Lac+ reversion rates were estimated as described in Materials and Methods. Each comparative plot represents median and ≥95% confidence intervals estimated using 10 or 11 replicates of each strain (refer to Tables S5 and S6).