Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 18;16(4):388–402. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2011.00467.x

Table 2.

Results of 15 Prospective Studies of Microvolt T‐Wave Alternans

Author PPV (%) (95% CI) NPV (%) (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Klingenheben et al. 8 18 (10−28) 100 (89−100)  12.24 (0.75−199.96)
Tapanainen et al. 9 1 (0−5)  99 (96−100)  1.41 (0.09−22.31)
Grimm et al. 10 16 (11−22) 90 (81−96)   1.67 (0.77−3.62)
Hohnloser et al. 11 16 (9−24)  94 (80−99)   2.64 (0.64−10.90)
Hohnloser et al. 12 13 (7−21)  100 (90−100)   9.47 (0.58−155.88)
Sarzi Braga et al. 13 21 (9−39)   100 (75−100)   6.18 (0.38−100.99)
Bloomfield et al. 14 13 (10−17) 98 (95−99)   6.17 (2.26−16.86)
Ikeda et al. 15 6 (3−9)  100 (99−100)  14.59 (4.26−49.99)
Baravelli et al. 16 23 (11−38) 93 (78−99)   3.38 (0.79−14.49)
Cantillon et al.*, 17 17 (12−23) 90 (82−95)   1.68 (0.84−3.37)
Chow et al. 18 25 (22−29) 87 (82−91)   1.89 (1.34−2.67)
ALPHA19 9 (6−12)  98 (94−100)  4.39 (1.35−14.32)
MASTER20 13 (10−17) 90 (85−93)  1.29 (0.80−2.08)
SCD−HeFT substudy21 17 (13−21) 88 (81−93)   1.40 (0.84−2.35)
ABCD22 8 (6−11)  96 (91−98)   1.86 (0.84−4.14)
Overall 14 (13−15) 95 (94−96)   2.35 (1.68−3.28)