Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 8;8(2):127–131. doi: 10.1046/j.1542-474X.2003.08206.x

Table 4.

Relation Between Heart Rate Turbulence Analysis, Clinical Characteristics, and Follow‐Up Results in 43 Healthy Volunteers

HRT Onset ≥0% HRT Slope ≤ 2.5 ms per RRI
Yes No Yes No
Number of healthy volunteers 8 (19%) 35 (81%) 2 (5%) 41 (95%)
 Age (years) 49 ± 12 51 ± 10 58 ± 3 48 ± 5 a
 Men/women 6/2 21/14 1/1 26/15
Echocardiographic evaluation
 LV end‐diastolic diameter (mm) 48 ± 3 49 ± 5 50 ± 5 49 ± 4
 LV ejection fraction (%) 70 ± 6 70 ± 4 63 ± 4 70 ± 4
24‐Hour Holter electrocardiogram
 Mean R‐R interval (ms) 829 ± 96 820 ± 106 776 ± 93 824 ± 104
 SDNN (ms) 148 ± 30 142 ± 36 118 ± 26 144 ± 35
 Frequent VPDs (>10/hour) 1 (12%) 6 (17%) 0 (0%) 7 (17%)
 Couplets of VPDs 1 (12%) 5 (14%) 0 (0%) 6 (15%)
 Nonsustained VT 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Follow‐up results
 Follow‐up duration (months) 34 ± 16 27 ± 13 48 ± 5 27 ± 13
 All‐cause mortality 1 (12%)b 0 (0%) 1 (50%)b 0 (0%)
 Cardiac death 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

RRI = R‐R interval; other abbreviations as in Table 1. aP < 0.05. bDeath due to cancer, which was first diagnosed several months after study enrollment.