Table 1. Genotype differences observed in 12 paired samples: Clinical samples analyzed by SureSelect and derived isolates sequenced classically.
Sample code | Clinical sample ISC genotype | Derived isolate ISC genotype | Total base difference* | Homozygous difference | Heterozygous difference | Indel difference | Karyotype (bone marrow) | Karyotype (derived isolate) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPK77 | ISC4 | ISC6 | 47 | 20 | 7 | 4 | almost diploid** | trisomy on ch5 and 11 |
BPK80 | UG | ISC4 | 42 | 17 | 8 | 3 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 20, 26, 33 and 35. tetrasomic on ch23 |
BPK87 | ISC6 | ISC4 | 55 | 21 | 13 | 4 | almost diploid | regular |
BPK91 | ISC3 | ISC4 | 36 | 14 | 8 | 8 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch20, 26 and 33 |
BPK156 | ISC3 | ISC1 | 68459 | 34146 | 167 | 6275 | almost diploid | monosomic on ch17 |
BPK157 | ISC4 | ISC1 | 64254 | 29942 | 4370 | 8281 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch23, 33 and 35 |
BPK177 | ISC9 | ISC5 | 55 | 26 | 3 | 3 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 23, 27 and 32. tetrasomic on ch33 |
BPK276 | ISC5 | ISC4 | 40 | 18 | 4 | 1 | monosomic on ch17 | trisomic on ch4, 11, 20, 23. tetrasomic on ch5 |
BPK280 | ISC4 | UG | 21 | 9 | 3 | 4 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch1, 7, 8, 10, 13. 15, 20, 22, 23. tetrasomic on ch9 |
BPK81 | ISC4 | ISC4 | 13 | 3 | 7 | LdAQP1: frameshift G/GA insertion | almost diploid | regular |
BPK181 | ISC6 | ISC6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch8, 9, 13 and 23 |
BPK208 | ISC4 | ISC4 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 0 | almost diploid | trisomic on ch1, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 20, 22 and 23. tetrasomic on ch9 |
Total base difference* = Homozygous difference x 2 + Heterozygous difference. Almost diploid**: S-value was 2 in all chromosomes except the tetrasomic chromosome 31. Notes: (1) the S-values of chromosome 11 in all bone marrow samples were slightly higher due to amplification artefact and therefore, their values were assumed to be disomic. (2) The S-values of chromosome 31 of BPK87BM and BPK80BM were lower than the expected tetrasomic values due to lower genome coverage.