Table 4.
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcomes | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noda et al., 199814 | 4 | 1 | - | 5 |
Wiklund et al., 200017 | 5 | 1 | - | 6 |
Aydin et al., 200418 | 4 | 2 | - | 6 |
Wakai et al., 200416 | 3 | 1 | - | 4 |
Chrysostomakis et al., 200619 | 3 | 2 | - | 5 |
Coruzzi et al., 200620 | 4 | 1 | - | 5 |
Aytemir et al., 200721 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
Zhu et al., 201222 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Chang et al., 201324 | 5 | 2 | - | 7 |
Kim et al., 201523 | 5 | 2 | - | 7 |
Palma et al., 201525 | 4 | 2 | - | 6 |
Xie et al., 201715 | 3 | 1 | - | 4 |
Assessment strategy: selection (max. 5 stars), comparability (max. 2 stars) and outcome (max. 3 stars). Range 0-10 stars.