Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug;40(8):1291–1298. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6119

Table 2:

Regional volumes and mean intensity values for MRI parametersa

WML Penumbra (0–2 mm) Penumbra (2–4 mm) dNAWM Regression Coefficient
Mean volume (cm3) 0.738 (0.842) 2.78 (2.26) 5.81 (4.21) 219 (3.68) NA
[0.661–0.815] [2.57–2.99] [5.43–6.19] [186–253]
FLAIR intensity 136 (10.1) 98.9 (3.50) 79.4 (3.71) 70.8 (2.58) −0.854
[135–137] [98.6–99.2] [79.1–79.7] [70.6–71.0]
T1 intensity 116 (6.43) 132 (5.80) 142 (4.50) 156 (1.31) 0.824
[115–117] [132–133] [142–142] [156–156]
T2 intensity 115 (8.62) 88.3 (6.82) 74.1 (4.75) 60.6 (1.02) −0.734
[114–115] [87.7–88.9] [73.7–74.5] [60.5–60.7]
FA 0.279 (0.0554) 0.328 (0.0411) 0.374 (0.0380) 0.384 (0.0254) 0.630
[0.273–0.284] [0.324–0.331] [0.371–0.377] [0.382–0.386]
MD (10−3) 3.68 (0.662) 3.23 (0.445) 2.97 (0.344) 2.33 (0.112) −0.578
[3.62–3.73] [3.19–3.27] [2.93–3.00] [2.32–2.34]
CBF (mL/100 g/min) 25.2 (10.3) 26.9 (9.37) 28.8 (9.06) 34.4 (8.56) 0.306
[24.3–26.1] [26.1–27.7] [28.0–29.6] [33.6–35.2]
VR 0.776 (0.493) 0.779 (0.379) 0.790 (0.328) 0.681 (0.377) 0.192
(Mean % change) [0.731–0.821] [0.745–0.813] [0.760–0.820] [0.647–0.715]

Note:—NA indicates not applicable.

a

SD is in parentheses, and 95% confidence intervals for intensity parameters are in brackets. Kruskal-Wallis tests were significant for all parameters, and pair-wise comparisons had P < .001 except that the WML and penumbral ROIs did not show significant differences in VR. The slope of linear regression across the 4 regions for intensity variables using a median value is shown in the last column; regression analyses were all statistically significant with P < .001.