. 2019 Dec 12;11(23):11111–11123. doi: 10.18632/aging.102513

Table 2. Predictive concordance of FDZS, TNM and BCLC based on A09 or non-A09.

		FDZS5	FDZS3	TNM	A09+TNM	BCLC	A09+BCLC
		Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance	Concordance
Training	Combined			0.667	0.672	0.602	0.617
Training	Separated	0.72	0.687	0.679	0.683	0.671	0.678
Internal validation	Combined			0.624	0.63	0.62	0.629
Internal validation	Separated	0.63	0.608	0.641	0.649	0.653	0.664
External validation	Combined			0.788	0.85	0.688	0.85
External validation	Separated	0.85	0.762	0.862	0.95	0.75	0.888

Calculated with tumor number, size, MVI, LN in TNM staging system and tumor number, size, MVI, TB, Child-Pugh in BCLC staging system(separated) or TNM, BCLC(combined).