Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Jun 27;32(6):590–603. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1628625

Table 3:

Association between high intensity caregiving support and “exclusively homebound” status (propensity weighted sample*) (n=858), 2015

Odds Ratio P-value 95% CI
Primary analysis: high intensity caregiving
  ≥20 hours of caregiving support per week 0.56 <0.01 0.38–0.83
Secondary analysis: alternative definitions of high intensity caregiving
  ≥4 caregivers 0.74 0.08 0.52–1.04
  Any paid help 0.68 0.03 0.49–0.96
*

Included factors were age, female gender, race, marital status number of children, income, Medicaid status, high school education or greater, self-reported health fair or poor, count of medical conditions, lung disease, depression, dementia, impairment in 3+ ADLs, impairment in 3+ iADLs, use of assistive devices, region of residence, and living in a metropolitan area.