Abstract
The wild Prunus korshinskyi has a restricted distribution in small scattered areas of Jabal Al-Lauz (2580 m above sea level), a mountain in northwestern Saudi Arabia. Major objective of current study is to provide information about P. korshinskyi by analyzing its ecology in terms of floristic diversity, plant associations, environmental features, and its size structure and nutritional value. For this purpose, 12 stands of 20 m2 were selected along the Jabal Al-Lauz mountain ridge. Three plant associations and their environmental variables were identified and characterized after application of a two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN), detrended correspondence analysis (DCA). And canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) as follows: VGI: P. korshinskyi-Astracantha echinus, VGII: Artemisia siberi-P. korshinskyi, and VGIII: Retama raetam-Artemisia sieberi. The edaphic factor affecting the distribution of the associations were pH, potassium and manganese content. The size class frequency distribution of P. korshinskyi shows a J-shape in spring and fall for the whole population; there was no regeneration via seed. Nutritional evaluation showed the fruits had a higher content of total carbohydrate, fats, crude protein, phosphorus, and potassium, and lower content of ash, Fe, Ca, Mn, Mg, and Zn than that in stems and leaves. This ecological knowledge gained through this study would be beneficial for managing and conserving of P. korshinskyi in a Jabal Al-Lauz area with its distinct and unique vegetation.
Keywords: Genetic resources, Prunus korshinskyi, Conservation, Regeneration
1. Introduction
Phytosociological analysis of plant community is the primary basis for the study of any vegetation, as it is a prerequisite to the understanding of community structure and organization. It provides information on the structure and dynamics, external influences, biological responses to change interaction of species/classes and interlinkages amongst species, successional status of key species and ecological restoration of degraded habitats in a community (Kent, 2012). Such studies provide information on distribution of species and also on the affinities between or within the classes results in the valuable assessment of vegetation within the study area (Frenedozo-Soave, 2003). Phytosocological as well as autecological studies are of great significance for their own sake; the progress of the study of plant communities is greatly affected by the lack of evidence regarding the life history and biotic relations of their constituent species.
Jabal Al-Lauz is the highest mountain in the northern Hijaz in northwestern Saudi Arabia. The mountain has a varied vegetation with a great degree of Mediterranean influence. There are several plant species that cannot be found anywhere else in the kingdom. Prunus korshinskyi Hand.-Mazz., is one of the dominant species found at high altitudes. In arid regions, the high-altitude areas are certainly the main hotspots with much species diversity in variable habitats (Thomas et al., 2017). The biodiversity in relation to vulnerable ecosystems in arid areas has been largely affected through many factors inconsists of both climate change and human impacts (Zhang and Ma, 2008). To our knowledge, there are no previous studies of the ecology, vegetation as well as the floristic features of this area.
As per the IUCN red list of threatened species, P. korshinskyi has a vulnerable status (Güner, 1998). It is a small-sized tree, which is distributed in Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, and Saudi Arabia, mostly found in northern Hijaz Mountains. Ecology of P. korshinskyi in Saudi Arabian habitats has not been studied before, and this is the first study of its kind. It will pave the way for improving the conservation strategies of this endangered plant not only in Saudi Arabia but in other countries as well.
The present study aims to provide information about P. korshinskyi by investigating its ecology: (1) floristic diversity, vegetation structure and environmental features and (2) P. korshinskyi size structure and nutritional value of its component parts. The characteristics of the individual plant populations along with the conditions under which they grow have great influence on the distribution of the species. This study will help understanding the floristic composition as well as the present and future status of the endangered P. korshinskyi.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study area
Jabal Al-Lauz is present in northwestern area of Saudi Arabia near Gulf of Aqaba in the Tabuk region (Fig. 1). The Jabal Al-Lauz range consumes about 464 km2; highest peak (2580 m above sea level) is located at 28°39′15″N 35°18′21″E. To the north is the Wadi Hajy, to the south is the Wadi Houi, to the west is the valley of Afal, and to the east is the Wadi Al'abyd. According to a US Geological Survey report, the peak of Jabal Al-Lauz, consists of light colored, calcium-rich, alkaline granite that is intruded by rhyolite and andesite rock sheet dikes.
Fig. 1.
Prunus korshinskyi in Jabal Al-Lauz, N.W. Saudi Arabia showing the samples stands.
The climate is continental, even though influenced sporadically at the Mediterranean Sea. At winter season, the penetration of cool Mediterranean air masses brings frontal rainfall events with high intensities. During summer, 47 °C is highest temperature, and −2°C is lowest during winter. Overall, 28 °C and 12 °C is the on an average temperatures in summer and winter (Alsharan et al., 2001). 20 mm is the average rainfall per annum (Fig. 2), 40 mm is the annual evaporation.
Fig. 2.
Tabuk climate diagram, Saudi Arabia (1987–2015).
2.2. Vegetation samples
Totally, 12 samples relevés of 20 × 20 m were established in Jabal Al-Lauz, as two groups: relevés 1–9 were in Jabal 1 group and relevés 10–12 were in Jabal 2 group during the spring and fall seasons of 2016 (Fig. 1). Selected plant specimens were collected as per Collenette, 1999, Chaudhary, 1999. The species which are life form is determined by Raunkiaer et al (1934). Based on the chrological analysis, the species which comes under category of floristic and abundance cover are also made (Wickens, 1978, Zohary, 1973, Kent, 2012) (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Morphology of the plant and fruits attacked by the insects.
2.3. Nutritional analysis of P. korshinskyi
In April 2016, from each stand, the plant samples were selected stand and separated into stem, leaves, and fruits. Each of these plant parts were further cleaned, dried under shade and powdered with a metal-free plastic mill. Sodium, ferrous, calcium, magnesium, potassium, manganese, zinc and phosphorus were analyzed. Ash content was assessed at 500 °C, total lipids were determined with ether extract. Crude protein (CP) and carbohydrates were calculated. Allen et al (1989) protocol was implemented in this study.
2.4. Size structure of P. korshinskyi
Concerned stands with area 20 m × 20 m the height as H and mean crown diameter as CD measured in different orientations based on uniformity with crown of measured tree in an individual plant of P. korshinskyi were measured (cm) in spring and autumn. The size index of P. korshinskyi is calculated as H + CD/2 (Crisp and Lange, 1976, Shaltout et al., 2003). Size index values were measured to find the distribution frequency in various size (age) cohorts. Specific size estimations are used for classifying the P. korshinskyi population in nine categories (first and second classes represent the juvenile stages). There were no seedlings. Overall density of plant species/hectare were measured in order to assess the characteristics of precise classes. We have also calculated the mean of height, density, size index and crown diameter of P. korshinskyi for separate season were also measured.
2.5. Analysis of soil samples
From the similar releves the soil samples were adopted during the similar time along with the plant samples. As per the loss on ignition, an organic matter was resoluted at 550 °C. The texture of soil was determined using the method of hydrometer. Soil water extracts were prepared at 1:5, for estimating the pH, electrical conductivity (EC, mS cm−1) and soil nutrient elements (calcium, potassium, sodium, magnesium, ferrous and phosphorus) (Allen et al 1989).
2.6. Vegetation data analysis
Both the plant species cover the soil variable data sets which were subjected to multivariate analyses for classification using TWINSPAN (Hill, 1979a) and confirmed by the ordination using DECORANA (Hill, 1979b) of the Jabal Al-Lauz vegetation. CCA was carried out by Canoco 4.5 for windows to correlate between a derived vegetation and their environmental variable data set (Ter Braak and Smilauer, 2002).
Richness of the species for each vegetation association of P. korshinskyi and habitat were measured on an average species number/relevé. This species cover importance values were applied to assess the relative species evenness by index of Shannon-Weaver: and the relative species concentration dominance by index of Simpson: C; (s) is species no. and (pi) is the % cover of the (ith) species. More details about these indices are available in Pielou (1975).
2.7. Statistical analysis
Pearson’s simple linear correlation coefficient (r) was used to test the relation between DCA axes and environmental variables. The variations of species diversity and soil characteristics in relation with vegetation associations are done by One-way ANOVA analysis (SAS, 1989–1996).
3. Results
3.1. Floristic composition
A total of 44 species from 21 families were recorded; highly signified families; Asteraceae, Cruciferae and Lamiaceae. Sub-shrubs constituted the most common life form (50%), followed by annual herbs (27.3%) and shrubs (15.9%) (Table 1; Fig. 4a). Jabel Al-Louz in the northwestern region influenced with Saharo-Arabian floristic elements (31.8%), followed by elements belongs to the Mediterranean region (20.5%). Mediterranean-Irano-Turanian and Tropical-African have the highest value among the biregional elements (6.8%) (Table 1; Fig. 4b).
Table 1.
Synoptic table of the recorded species cover in the three vegetation clusters identified after application of TWINSPAN: VGI: Prunus korshinskyi-Astracantha echinus, VGII: Artemisia sieberi-Prunus korshinskyi and VGIII: Retama raetam-Artemisia sieberi. Life forms: Ah: Annual herb, PG: Perennial grass, SSH: Subshrub, SH: Shrub, TR: Tree The chorotypes: AF: African, IT = Irano Turanian, Med = Mediterranean, SA = Saharo Arabian, SM = Somalia Masai, TR: Tropical.
| Species | Family | Life form | Chorotype | VG I | VG II | VG III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prunus korshinskyi | Roaceae | SH | Med | 20 | 15 | 10 |
| Artemisia sieberi | Asteraceae | SSH | IT | 50 | 60 | 20 |
| Tanacetum santolioides | Asteraceae | SSH | IT | 10 | 15 | . |
| Alkanna orientalis | Boraginaceae | AH | Med-IT | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Retama raetam | Leguminosae | SH | SA | . | 5 | 40 |
| Astracantha echinus | Leguminosae | SH | IT | 5 | 25 | . |
| Ononis natrix | Leguminosae | SSH | TR AF | . | 5 | 8 |
| Nepeta sheilae | Labiatae | SSH | SA | . | 2 | 1 |
| Ferula sinaica | Umbelliferae | SSH | SA | . | 2 | 5 |
| Echinops glaberrimus | Asteraceae | SSH | SA | . | 2 | 5 |
| Centaurea eryngioides | Asteraceae | SSH | IT | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Zilla spinosa | Cruciferae | AH | SA | . | . | 6 |
| Gypsophila capillaris | Caryophyllaceae | SSH | IT | . | . | 1 |
| Picris babylonica | Asteraceae | AH | SA | . | 2 | . |
| Sisymbrium erysimoides | Cruciferae | AH | Med-SA | . | 1 | 1 |
| Asparagussp. | Asparagaceae | SH | Med | . | 5 | . |
| Teucrium polium | Labiatae | SSH | Med-IT | . | 5 | 3 |
| Allysum subspinosum | Cruciferae | AH | SA | 5 | 4 | 2 |
| Anarrhinum forsskalii | Scrophulariaceae | AH | Med | . | 2 | . |
| Galium spurium | Rubiaceae | AH | TR-AF | 1 | . | . |
| Ballota undulata | Labiatae | SSH | Med | 1 | 5 | . |
| Pterocephalus sanctus | Dipsacaceae | SSH | SA | 1 | 5 | . |
| Noaea mucronata | Chenopodiaceae | SSH | IT | 5 | 5 | . |
| Verbascum sinaiticum | Scrophulariaceae | SSH | IT-SA-SH | 1 | 1 | . |
| Ballota adenophora | Labiatae | SSH | Med | . | 1 | . |
| Sisymbrium septulatum | Cruciferae | AH | TR AF | 1 | . | . |
| Silene linearis | Caryophyllaceae | SSH | SM | . | 2 | . |
| Rosa abyssinica | Roaceae | SH | SM | . | 2 | . |
| Stachys aegyptiaca | Cruciferae | AH | TR AF | . | 1 | . |
| Antirrhinum orontium | Scrophulariaceae | AH | Med | 1 | . | . |
| Diplotaxis harra | Cruciferae | AH | SA | . | 1 | . |
| Fagonia mollis | Zygophyllaceae | SH | SA | . | 2 | . |
| Atraphaxis spinosa | Polygonaceae | SSH | Med | 5 | 1 | . |
| Deverra triradiata | Umbelliferae | SSH | SA | . | 1 | . |
| Campanula erinus | Campanulaceae | AH | Med | . | 1 | . |
| Origanum syriacum | Labiatae | SSH | Med | . | 1 | . |
| Parietaria alsinifolia | Urticaceae | AH | SA | . | 1 | . |
| Ephedra foliata | Ephedraceae | SH | SA-IT | . | . | . |
| Lavandula pubescens | Labiatae | SSH | SA-IT | . | . | . |
| Pistacia khinjuk | Anacardiaceae | Tr | Med-IT | . | . | . |
| Piptatherum miliaceum | Gramineae | Per.grass | Med-SA | . | . | . |
| Astragalus spinosus | Leguminosae | SSH | IT | . | . | . |
| Ficus palmata | Moraceae | Tr | SM | . | . | . |
| Scrophularia deserti | Scrophulariaceae | SSH | SA | . | . | . |
Fig. 4.
Life-form relative spectrum of Jabal Al-Lauz vegetation (a). The chorotypes of Jabal Al-Lauz (b): AF: African, IT: Irano Turanian, Med: Mediterranean, SA: Saharo Arabian, SM: Somalia Masai and TR: Tropical.
3.2. Plant associations
The TWINSPAN -analysis at level 2 indicated three vegetation groups (Table 2; Fig. 5a and b). After the initial and secondary dominant species, these groups were names as VGI: P. korshinskyi-Astracantha echinus; VGII: Artemisia sieberi-P. korshinskyi; and VGIII: Retama raetam-Artemisia sieberi. The DCA -analysis verified the -distinction of these groups (Fig. 5b). The correlation analysis between the environmental variables and ordination axes was verified by CCA (Table 3; Fig. 6). The segregation of relevés along axis 1 is -influenced positively by pH, K, and Mn (Table 3; Fig. 6a). The evenness and Shannon index are positively associated through axis-2, but Mn and species are negatively correlated with axis-2. Annual herbs (such as: Picris babylonica, Sisymbrium erysimoides, Diplotaxis harra, and Parietaria alsinifolia) are situated at upper positive side of axis-2 and correlates with organic matter, EC, Mg, and sand content (Fig. 6b), while the perennial herbs (Ballota undulata, Origanum syriacum, Stachys aegyptiaca, and Tanacetum santolinoides) are situated at lower negative side of axis-2 by plant cover, Simpson index, and P content.
Table 2.
Inter-set correlations between environmental variables and DCA axes in Jabal Al-Lauz.
| Variable | Axis 1 | Axis 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Soil Variable | ||
| pH | 0.7313*** | −0.1554 |
| EC mS/cm | −0.0396 | 0.0341 |
| Bulk soil % | ||
| Organic Matter | −0.2271 | 0.2154 |
| Sand | −0.1934 | 0.0552 |
| Clay | 0.1556 | −0.2325 |
| Silt | 0.1897 | 0.1239 |
| Macro-elements ppm | ||
| Sodium | 0.2603 | −0.1200 |
| Magnesium | −0.0270 | 0.0984 |
| Phosphorus | −0.1239 | −0.1032 |
| Potassium | 0.4127** | −0.1264 |
| Calcium | 0.0372 | 0.1208 |
| Manganese | 0.4977** | −0.4458* |
| Ferrous | −0.0229 | −0.0461 |
| Diversity indices | ||
| Species number | 0.2246 | −0.0320 |
| Species cover (m100 m−1) | −0.0647 | −0.5556** |
| Species richness (spp. stand−1) | 0.2480 | 0.1816 |
| Evenness | 0.1383 | 0.5352** |
| Shannon (Ĥ) | 0.3519 | 0.4904** |
| Simpson (C) | −0.1985 | −0.5500** |
P ≤ 0.05.
P ≤ 0.01.
P ≤ 0.001.
Fig. 5.
TWINSPAN classification of sample relevés into three vegetation groups (a) and confirmed by DCA ordination (b).
Table 3.
Correlation analysis of species diversity indices and soil features.
| Variable | Species number | Species richness | Species cover | Evenness | Shannon (Ĥ) | Simpson (C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil variables | ||||||
| pH | 0.4112* | 0.4310* | −0.0308 | 0.1875 | 0.4625* | −0.3796 |
| EC mS/cm | 0.0694 | 0.0025 | 0.3723 | −0.1806 | −0.0256 | 0.1731 |
| Bulk soil % | ||||||
| Organic matter | 0.1833 | 0.1511 | 0.2932 | 0.0833 | 0.2535 | −0.1917 |
| Sand | 0.5958** | 0.5120** | 0.5377** | 0.0472 | 0.5030** | −0.4000* |
| Clay | −0.5218** | −0.5041** | −0.3315 | −0.2238 | −0.5920** | 0.5262** |
| Silt | −0.5442** | −0.4148* | −0.6233** | 0.1296 | −0.3159 | −0.0827 |
| Macro-elements ppm | ||||||
| Sodium | −0.1984 | −0.2658 | 0.2049 | 0.3021 | 0.0215 | −0.1917 |
| Calcium | 0.1074 | 0.0675 | 0.3056 | 0.0111 | 0.1556 | −0.0379 |
| Manganese | 0.4712* | 0.4227* | 0.06630 | −0.3676 | 0.0453 | 0.1256 |
| Magnesium | 0.1746 | 0.1271 | 0.3705 | −0.0853 | 0.1273 | 0.0134 |
| Potassium | −0.1190 | −0.1300 | −0.3834 | 0.3131 | −0.2897 | 0.4821* |
| Ferrous | 0.2951 | 0.2115 | 0.1146 | −0.1528 | 0.1346 | 0.0194 |
| Phosphorus | 0.0336 | −0.0203 | −0.5856** | −0.056 | −0.3667 | 0.5671** |
P ≤ 0.05.
P ≤ 0.01.
Fig. 6.
CCA biplot and environmental variables (arrows), the stands (a) and the species (b). (For complete names of species, see Table 1).
3.3. Interaction with species diversity and soil
Total number of species and richness is absolutely associated with pH, sand and Mn content. However, it is negatively associated with clay and silt content (Table 3). Species is positive associated with sand content and negatively associated with clay, silt and phosphorous content. Evenness shows a positive correlation with sand. The Shannon index is significantly associated with pH and sand content and negatively connected with clay content. The Simpson index is significantly associated with clay and potassium and phosphorus content; negatively corelated with sand content.
3.4. Soil characteristics of vegetation group(s)
P. korshinskyi-Astracantha echinus (VG I) had -high values in species evenness, Shannon index, organic matter, clay, magnesium, phosphorus and ferrous content, and the lowest values in total species number, total plant cover, Simpson, pH and manganese content (Table 4). The P. korshinskyi-Artemisia sieberi community (VG II) had higher content of the total species number, total plant cover, richness, Simpson index, sand and lower values of species evenness, Shannon, salinity, clay, silt, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus, and ferrous. The Retama raetam-Artemisia sieberi community (VG III) had the higher values of species richness, salinity, pH, silt, manganese, potassium, sodium, calcium and lower values of organic matter and sand content.
Table 4.
Mean ± standard error of diversity indices and soil variable of three vegetation groups after TWINSPAN: VGI: Prunus korshinskyi -Astracantha echinus, VGII: Artemisia sieberi-Prunus korshinskyi and VGIII: Retama raetam-Artemisia sieberi. Maximum and minimum values are shown in bold.
| Variable | VG I | VG II | VG III | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diversity indices | |||||
| Species number | 9.00 | 11.08 | 9.33 | 3.955* | 0.032 |
| ±2.00 | ±1.73 | ±3.06 | |||
| Species cover (m–100 m−1) | 44.00 | 85.25 | 58.00 | 2.563 | 0.098 |
| ±23.52 | ±18.14 | ±25.94 | |||
| Species richness (spp. Stand−1) | 2.22 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 3.687* | 0.039 |
| ±0.74 | ±0.29 | ±0.58 | |||
| Evenness | 0.84 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 2.054 | 0.156 |
| ±0.02 | ±0.10 | ±0.07 | |||
| Shannon (Ĥ) | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 2.582 | 0.096 |
| ±0.09 | ±0.08 | ±0.15 | |||
| Simpson (C) | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 2.320 | 0.122 |
| ±0.04 | ±0.07 | ±0.09 | |||
| Soil Variables | |||||
| pH | 7.77 | 7.85 | 8.18 | 13.54*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.03 | ±0.11 | ±0.07 | |||
| EC mS/cm | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.56 | 2.205 | 0.135 |
| ±0.05 | ±0.17 | ±0.07 | |||
| Bulk Soil % | |||||
| Organic matter | 9.91 | 9.16 | 7.99 | 0.291 | 0.878 |
| ±1.02 | ±4.39 | ±0.10 | |||
| Sand | 76.67 | 78.61 | 76.33 | 1.211 | 0.360 |
| ±3.06 | ±3.35 | ±1.53 | |||
| Clay | 7.33 | 6.56 | 7.33 | 0.659 | 0.633 |
| ±1.15 | ±2.45 | ±1.15 | |||
| Silt | 16.00 | 14.83 | 16.33 | 1.079 | 0.413 |
| ±3.46 | ±1.00 | ±0.58 | |||
| Macro-elements ppm | |||||
| Sodium | 102.97 | 98.43 | 125.43 | 5.083** | 0.014 |
| ±4.41 | ±9.91 | ±16.46 | |||
| Magnesium | 2110.83 | 1362.55 | 1956.45 | 2.080 | 0.152 |
| ±212.92 | ±455.61 | ±152.75 | |||
| Phosphorus | 150.27 | 102.04 | 127.30 | 1.737 | 0.212 |
| ±49.30 | ±80.43 | ±20.82 | |||
| Potassium | 600.29 | 477.78 | 1002.85 | 4.149* | 0.027 |
| ±17.91 | ±192.92 | ±100.00 | |||
| Calcium | 236.94 | 155.17 | 244.96 | 2.491 | 0.104 |
| ±14.90 | ±78.51 | ±25.17 | |||
| Manganese | 1.86 | 6.68 | 10.19 | 2.106 | 0.148 |
| ±0.45 | ±5.43 | ±2.08 | |||
| Ferrous | 113.23 | 94.39 | 122.57 | 1.114 | 0.398 |
| ±7.21 | ±33.25 | ±15.72 | |||
P ≤ 0.05.
P ≤ 0.01.
P ≤ 0.001.
3.5. Nutritional analysis
Nutritional analysis on the plant parts of P. korshinskyi revealed that the stems showed the highest content of ferrous, manganese, magnesium, and zinc and lowest content of fats, crude protein, and sodium. Leaves had the highest content of ash, sodium, and calcium and lowest content of carbohydrate, phosphorus, and potassium. Whereas, the fruits had the highest content of carbohydrate, fats, crude protein, phosphorus, and potassium, and lowest content of ash, ferrous, calcium, manganese, magnesium, and zinc (Table 5).
Table 5.
Mean and ± standard deviation of some nutritional components of Prunus korshinskyi. Maximum and minimum values are shown in bold.
| Contents | Stem | Leaf | Fruit | Total Mean | F-Value | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organic contents % | ||||||
| Total carbohydrate | 37.83 | 56.17 | 26.27 | 40.09 | 141.58*** | 0.000 |
| ±1.19 | ±0.96 | ±3.48 | ±13.19 | |||
| Total lipids | 1.53 | 1.71 | 31.08 | 11.44 | 416.72*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.38 | ±0.27 | ±2.46 | ±14.78 | |||
| Crude protein | 8.18 | 18.57 | 21.10 | 15.95 | 35.22*** | 0.000 |
| ±1.95 | ±0.55 | ±2.81 | ±6.18 | |||
| Total ash | 7.88 | 21.30 | 6.23 | 11.80 | 0.81 | 0.487 |
| ±1.58 | ±27.46 | ±0.06 | ±15.50 | |||
| Minerals contents ugl−1 | ||||||
| Sodium | 126.98 | 165.22 | 144.70 | 145.63 | 6816.56*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.16 | ±0.39 | ±0.56 | ±16.58 | |||
| Ferrous | 252.00 | 239.79 | 130.55 | 207.45 | 30144.46*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.31 | ±0.72 | ±0.85 | ±57.92 | |||
| Phosphorus | 126.59 | 113.86 | 180.73 | 140.39 | 8040.13*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.88 | ±0.30 | ±0.75 | ±30.76 | |||
| Potassium | 1157.26 | 613.40 | 3786.3 | 1852.32 | 82104.32*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.42 | ±0.76 | ±17.74 | ±1469.51 | |||
| Calcium | 915.70 | 935.24 | 355.92 | 735.62 | 2048986*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.17 | ±0.38 | ±0.55 | ±284.90 | |||
| Manganese | 279.95 | 108.44 | 76.73 | 155.04 | 205324*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.37 | ±0.50 | ±0.36 | ±94.69 | |||
| Magnesium | 3098.64 | 1260.55 | 1003.22 | 1787.47 | 1201390*** | 0.000 |
| ±2.71 | ±1.49 | ±0.48 | ±989.67 | |||
| Zinc | 68.65 | 67.41 | 61.93 | 66.00 | 76.41*** | 0.000 |
| ±0.93 | ±0.47 | ±0.65 | ±3.16 | |||
P ≤ 0.001.
3.6. Size structure
Population structure studies of P. korshinskyi revealed that during the spring and autumn seasons the values of density, diameter and size index are higher in Jabal 1 while height values are higher in Jabal 2 (Table 6). The ratio of height to diameter of P. korshinskyi is more than unity, with the trees having a cylindrical habit. The size class frequency distribution of P. korshinskyi shows J-shape in both spring and fall for the whole population (Fig. 7a, b).
Table 6.
Mean and ± SD values of some demographic variables of Prunus korshinskyi during spring and autumn seasons.
| Habitat | Density ind. ha−1 | Height cm/ind. | Diameter cm/ind. | Height: Diameter H:D | Size index cm | r-value between H and D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring season | ||||||
| Jabal-1 | 19.0 | 2573.81 | 7650.0 | 2.29 | 3760.12 | 0.91 |
| ±1842.46 | ±5500 | ±0.6 | ||||
| Jabal-2 | 6.7 | 5533.33 | 375.00 | 1.00 | 8891.67 | 0.733 |
| ±57.74 | ±11.0 | ±0.73 | ||||
| Autumn season | ||||||
| Jabal-1 | 18.5 | 2356.22 | 7650.0 | 2.89 | 3698.24 | 0.86 |
| ±1652.13 | ±5500.0 | ±0.56 | ||||
| Jabal-2 | 6.0 | 5436.12 | 374.0 | 2.21 | 8834.25 | 0.67 |
| ±52.45 | ±10.32 | ±0.67 | ||||
ind. = individual.
Fig. 7.
Size class frequency distribution for Prunus korshinskyi in spring and autumn seasons. The ranges of size classes are: 1, ≤500; 2, 501–1000; 3, 1001–1500; 4, 1501–2000; 5, 2001–2500; 6, 2501–3000; 7, 3001–3500; 8, 3501–4000; 9, ≥4000 cm.
4. Discussion
In Saudi Arabia limited distribution of P. korshinskyi were available from north-western side with few escarpments and slopes of Jabal Al-Lauz. It occurs due to inability of regeneration via seeds of flowers of P. korshinskyi is infected through the fruit wasp Eurytoma amygdali, which consumes the ovary during the flowering stage itself. This shows that P. korshinskyi might be propagated only by vegetative means in Jabal Al-Lauz since we have observed only small juvenile individuals.
Asteraceae, Cruciferae, and Lamiaceae were the most represented families in Jabal Al-Lauz. Similar results have been reported in Migahid, 1990, Thomas et al., 2016, and Thomas et al. (2017) in diverse regions especially in northern side of KSA, whereas the vegetation has a typical Saharo-Arabian floristic structure as reported by Quézel, 1978, Al-Hassan, 2006. The sub-shrubs (Chamaephytes), followed by therophytes and shrubs were the most common life forms in Jabal Al-Lauz. The high number of Chamaephytes is typical of dry desert vegetation (Deil, 2014). In addition, also therophytes with short life spans are adapted to dry habitats (Kassas and Imam, 1954, Asri, 2003, Shaltout et al., 2010, El-Sheikh, 2013). Our results are in line with other studies in different parts of KSA (Thomas et al., 2017, El-Sheikh et al., 2019).
There is a high share of Saharo-Arabian plants in this study site, as a result of the more convenient environmental factors which provide suitable shelter for Saharo-Arabian species (Ghazanfar and Fisher, 1998). The presence of numerous biregional elements species in Jabal Al-Lauz may be a result of the area being considered to be in a transition region between some floristic zones (e.g., Mediterranean, Irano-Turanian, Tropical and African). Alatar et al (2012) documented the phytogeographical areas have much influence on flora at north side of KSA.
P. korshinskyi is a three plant associations, two of them (VG I and VG II) are characterized by the presence P. korshinskyi. It is interesting to notify that P. korshinskyi was one of the main plant community components in Jabal Al-Lauz. Talhouk et al. (2000) reported similar results of endangered P. korshinskyi in the mountains of Lebanon. P. korshinskyi and associated species are found on many sites such as cliffs and between cracks on slopes of the mountain, which have an alkaline silty soil with more minerals composition.
The segregation of the releves laterally for the axis one is powerfully associated with pH, potassium, manganese, organic matter and sand content. Plant distribution and compositions are well known to be determined by the micro environmental features (Keenan and Kimmins, 1993). Annual herbs like Picris babylonica, Sisymbrium erysimoides, Diplotaxis harra, Parietaria alsinifolia were situated at upper positive region at both the axis connected with soil factors: organic matter, EC, Mg and sand content. There is an increasing amount of human activities (e.g.´, firing, trampling, grazing, and cultivation) occurring in Jabal Al-Lauz. Such activities may increase the organic matter and salinity, which alters the community structure and increase the proportion of therophytes (Shaltout and El-Sheikh, 2003).
Species number, cover, and richness were strongly associated with pH, sand and Mn content; negatively connected with clay and silt content. Whereas, the dominance of species “Simpson index” is significantly associated with clay, phosphorous and potassium content; negatively correlated with sand content. Similar -relations were stated by El-Sheikh et al. (2013). These correlation findings clearly illustrate the richness of the association VG II and why P. korshinskyi inhabits on sandy soil substrates which are the result of erosion of granite rocks. Certain species of grass have been reported as the main pioneering species of these sandy soil environments; the grasses stabilize the sandy substrate by fixing the sand in place, and also retain nutrients and moisture in the soils, thereby changing the environment and converting into conceivable for remaining larger plants like shrubs and trees to grow (Penney, 2010). In fact, species diversity increases with altitude where moisture content is high, due to the sand particles retained with high moisture under sandy surface and plant roots can reach to it (Deil, 2014). Thus, the higher altitude area of Jabal Al-Lauz in Saudi Arabia is considered to be a biodiversity hotspot and a vulnerable ecosystem due to climate change and increasing of anthropogenic factors (Zhang and Ma, 2008).
Our findings on the soil characteristics of P. korshinskyi shows that this species exhibits considerable tolerance to limestone/calcareous soils as well as drought, and it can tolerate cold conditions, and diseases. Therefore, it can be used as a rootstock for peach, plum, apricot and almond. These results are consistent with the results presented by Nicotra and Pellegrini, 1989, Vito et al., 2001, Gradziel, 2008, Reighard and Loreti, 2008.
Many economically important species of Prunus as peach, nectarine, European plum apricot, mume, cherry (sweet/sour) and almond have high nutritional value and are cultivated for their fruit and nut production. The nutritional quality of P. korshinskyi remains unexplored. Nutritional analysis of the stems, leaves, and fruits of P. korshinskyi revealed that the fruits had the highest content of carbohydrate, fats, P, Ca, and K. More studies should be done for enhancing the nutritional value of wild plant varieties. The main reason that limits such research is the lack of awareness about plant metabolism as well as the complex associations and interlinkage of many metabolic pathways. Both traditional plant breeding and advanced recombinant DNA techniques can be used to metabolically engineer underutilized wild plants to obtain desired quality traits.
P. korshinskyi had attained high productivity in the spring season during which water and minerals are more readily available after the rainy winter season on the Tabuk region with a maximum rainfall of 64 mm (Galal and Fahmy, 2012). After that, the plant succeeds a long dry season during summer and autumn with temperature reaching a maximum of 38.1 °C (Asri, 2003). The height:diameter ratio of P. korshinskyi is more than unity; therefore, the habit of the P. korshinskyi appears as cylindrical rather than the cushion shrubby desert habit. Therefore, this habit of the P. korshinskyi indicates the habitat of study area as following the Mediterranean region, which is relatively wetter than the desert habitat of the Saharo-Arabian region (Shaltout et al., 2003, El-Sheikh, 2013).
The size class frequency distribution of P. korshinskyi are in the whole population shows J-shape, where the plant populations consisted of very few individuals (one or two scattered individuals of an old shrub) which were growing in the grooves between stones that are protected from animal grazing. The chances of successful regeneration by seed of these populations are further reduced as the seeds are attacked and destroyed by the larvae of different pests. Alkassis and Sookar (2006) reported similar observations for almond, where regeneration by seed was reduced by larvae of the fruit wasp Eurytoma amygdali. There were no P. korshinskyi seedlings in the Jabal Al-Lauz populations. The only regeneration that has been reported has been by vegetative means through the dissemination of fragmented plant organs by grazing animals (Al-Rowaily et al., 2015).
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
The authors kindly acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through research group No. RGP-1438-053.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
References
- Alatar A., El-Sheikh M.A., Thomas J. Vegetation analysis of Wadi Al-Jufair, a hyper-arid region in Najd, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012;19:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Al-Hassan H.O. Ministry of Agriculture. Camel and Range Research Center; AlJouf, Saudi Arabia: 2006. Wild Plants of Northern Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Field Guide with Photography) [Google Scholar]
- Alkassis W., Sookar R. 9th Arab Congress of Plant Protection, Damascus, Syria. 2006. Almonds important pests in central Syria and their control measures. [Google Scholar]
- Allen S., Grimshaw H.M., Parkinson J.A., Quarmby C. fourth ed. Blackwell; London: 1989. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Rowaily S., El-Bana M., Al-Bakre D., Assaeed A., Hegazy A., Dar B. Effects of open grazing and livestock exclusion on floristic composition and diversity in natural ecosystem of Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015;22(4):430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alsharhan A.S., Rizk Z.A., Nairn A.E., Bakhit D.W., Alhajari S.A. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2001. Hydrogeology of an Arid Region – The Arabian Gulf and Adjoining Areas. [Google Scholar]
- Asri Y. Publishing Research Institute of Forests and Rangeland; Tehran: 2003. Plant Diversity in Touran Biosphere Reservoir, N305. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudhary S.A. Flora of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 1999;Vols. I–III [Google Scholar]
- Collenette S. National Commission for Wild Life Conservation and Development; Riyadh: 1999. Wild Flowers of Saudi Arabia. [Google Scholar]
- Crisp M.D., Lange R.T. Age structure, distribution and survival undergrazing of the arid-zone shrub Acacia burkitii. Oikos. 1976;27:86–92. [Google Scholar]
- Deil U. Rock communities and succulent vegetation in Northern Yemen (SW Arabia)–ecological, phytochorological and evolutionary aspects. Phytocoenologia. 2014;44:193–239. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sheikh M.A. Population structure of woody plants in the arid cloud forests of Dhofar, Southern Oman. Acta Bot. Croat. 2013;72(1):97–111. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sheikh M.A., Thomas J., Alatar A.A., Hegazy A.k., Abbady G.A., Alfarhan A.H., Okla M.I. Vegetation of Thumamah Nature Park: a managed arid land site in Saudi Arabia. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei. 2013;24:349–367. [Google Scholar]
- El-Sheikh M.A., Al-Sheri M.A., Alfarhan A.H., Alatar A.A., Rajakrishnan R., Al-Roweaily S.L. Threatened Prunus arabica in an ancient volcanic protected area of Saudi Arabia: Floristic diversity and plant associations. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019;26:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frenedozo-Soave R. Phytosociological studies on natural establishment of vegetation in an unreclaimed limestone mining. Brazil. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2003;46(2):259–269. [Google Scholar]
- Galal T.M., Fahmy A.G. Plant diversity and community structure of Wadi Gimal protected area, red sea coast of Egypt. Afr. J. Ecol. 2012;50:266–276. [Google Scholar]
- Ghazanfar S.A., Fisher M. Kluwer; London: 1998. Vegetation of the Arabian Peninsula. [Google Scholar]
- Gradziel T.M. Prunus dulcis- almond. In: Janick J., Paull R.E., editors. The Encyclopedia of Fruits and Nuts. CAB International; UK: 2008. pp. 705–717. [Google Scholar]
- Güner, A., 1998. Prunus korshinskyi. The IUCN red list of threatened species 1998. e.T34892A9891482. 10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T34892A9891482.en. [DOI]
- Hill M.O. Cornell University; Ithaca, NY: 1979. TWINSPAN – A FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-Way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. [Google Scholar]
- Hill M.O. Cornell University; Ithaca, NY: 1979. DECORANA – A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. [Google Scholar]
- Kassas M., Imam M. Habitats and plant communities in the Egyptian desert. III The wadi bed ecosystem. J. Ecol. 1954;42:424–441. [Google Scholar]
- Keenan R.J., Kimmins J.P. The ecological effects of clear-cutting. Environ. Rev. 1993;1:121–144. [Google Scholar]
- Kent M. second ed. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2012. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach. [Google Scholar]
- Migahid A.M. third ed., Vols. 1, 2 & 3. King Saud University Press; Riyadh: 1990. (Flora of Saudi Arabia). [Google Scholar]
- Nicotra A., Pellegrini M. Almond rootstock breeding for easy propagation. Opt. Mediterraneennes – Serie Sem. 1989;5:51–60. [Google Scholar]
- Penney, M., 2010. Dune building plants. Eastern Lake Ontario Dunes and Wetlands Fact Sheet Series, New York Sea Grant Extension. https://seagrant.sunysb.edu/lodune/pdfs/DunePlants.pdf.
- Pielou E.C. Wiley; New York: 1975. Ecological Diversity; p. 165. [Google Scholar]
- Quézel P. Analysis of the flora of Mediterranean and Saharan Africa. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1978;65:479–534. [Google Scholar]
- Raunkiaer C. Clarendon Press; Oxford, UK: 1934. Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. [Google Scholar]
- Reighard G.L., Loreti F. Rootstock development. In: Layne D.R., Bassi D., editors. The peach: Botany, Production and Uses. CAB International; Oxfordshire, UK: 2008. pp. 193–220. [Google Scholar]
- SAS, 1989–1996. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
- Shaltout K., El-Sheikh M. Vegetation of the urban habitats in the Nile Delta region, Egypt. Urban Ecosyst. 2003;6:205–221. [Google Scholar]
- Shaltout K.H., Sheded M.G., El-Kady H.F., Al-Sodany Y.M. Phytosociology and size structure of Nitraria retusa along the Egyptian Red Sea coast. J. Arid Environ. 2003;53:331–345. [Google Scholar]
- Shaltout K.H., Sheded M.G., Salem A.M. Vegetation spatial heterogeneity in a hyper arid Biosphere Reserve area in North Africa. Acta Bot. Croat. 2010;69:31–46. [Google Scholar]
- Talhouk S.N., Lubani R.T., Baalbaki R., Zurayk R., Alkhatib A., Parmaksizian L., Jaradat A.A. Phenotypic diversity and morphological characterization of Amygdalus L. species in Lebanon. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2000;47:93–104. [Google Scholar]
- Ter Braak, C.F.G., Smilauer, P., 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Window’s User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5). Ithaca, NY.
- Thomas J., El-Sheikh M.A., Alfarhan A.H., Alatar A.A., Savidasan M., Basahi M., Al-Obaid S., Rajakrishnan R. Impact of alien invasive species on habitats and species richness in Saudi Arabia. J. Arid Environ. 2016;127:53–65. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas J., El-Sheikh M.A., Alatar A.A. Endemics and endangered species in the biodiversity hotspot of the Shada Mountains, Saudi Arabia. J. Arid Land. 2017;9(1):109–121. [Google Scholar]
- Vito M.D., Battistini A., Catalano L. Response of Prunus rootstocks to root knot (Meloidogyne spp.) and root lesion (Pratylenchus vulnus) nematodes. Acta Hort. 2001;592:663–668. [Google Scholar]
- Wickens G.E. The flora of Jebel Marra (Sudan Republic) and its geographical affinities. Kew Bull. Add. Ser. 1978;5:385. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y.B., Ma K.P. Geographic distribution patterns and status assessment of threatened plants in China. Biodiv. Conserv. 2008;17(7):1783–1798. [Google Scholar]
- Zohary M. Gus. Fischer Verlage; Stuttgart: 1973. Geobotanical Foundations of the Middle East. [Google Scholar]







