Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2019 Nov 3;24(1):910–920. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14800

Inhibition of miR‐21 alleviated cardiac perivascular fibrosis via repressing EndMT in T1DM

Qianqian Li 1, Yufeng Yao 1, Shumei Shi 1, Mengchen Zhou 1, Yingchao Zhou 1, Mengru Wang 1, Jeng‐Jiann Chiu 2, Zhengrong Huang 3, Weili Zhang 4, Min Liu 5, Qing Wang 1,6,7, Xin Tu 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6933373  PMID: 31680453

Abstract

In type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, increased cardiac fibrosis, stiffness and associated diastolic dysfunction may be the earliest pathological phenomena in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Endothelial‐mesenchymal transition (EndMT) in endothelia cells (ECs) is a critical cellular phenomenon that increases cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) and cardiac fibrosis in diabetic hearts. The purpose of this paper is to explore the molecular mechanism of miR‐21 regulating EndMT and cardiac perivascular fibrosis in diabetic cardiomyopathy. In vivo, hyperglycaemia up‐regulated the mRNA level of miR‐21, aggravated cardiac dysfunction and collagen deposition. The condition was recovered by inhibition of miR‐21 following with improving cardiac function and decreasing collagen deposition. miR‐21 inhibition decreased cardiac perivascular fibrosis by suppressing EndMT and up‐regulating SMAD7 whereas activating p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3. In vitro, high glucose (HG) up‐regulated miR‐21 and induced EndMT in ECs, which was decreased by inhibition of miR‐21. A highly conserved binding site of NF‐κB located in miR‐21 5′‐UTR was identified. In ECs, SMAD7 is directly regulated by miR‐21. In conclusion, the pathway of NF‐κB/miR‐21/SMAD7 regulated the process of EndMT in T1DM, in diabetic cardiomyopathy, which may be regarded as a potential clinical therapeutic target for cardiac perivascular fibrosis.

Keywords: cardiac perivascular fibrosis, diabetic cardiomyopathy, endothelial‐mesenchymal transition, microRNA, SMAD7

1. INTRODUCTION

Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) increased the risk of heart failure (HF),1, 2 thereby inducing cardiomyopathy (referred to as diabetic cardiomyopathy), despite of the other cardiac risk factors, for instance, hypertension, atherosclerosis and valvular disease.3, 4, 5

Cardiac fibrosis and early‐stage left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy are the characteristics of diabetic cardiomyopathy,3, 4 which often progresses to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).6 In T1DM and T2DM, increased cardiac fibrosis, stiffness and associated diastolic dysfunction possibly are the earliest pathological varieties of diabetic cardiomyopathy.7 The underlying pathological mechanisms including perivascular and cardiac interstitial fibrosis and myocardial cell death in cardiac fibrosis pathogenesis in diabetic cardiomyopathy are well acknowledged,8 but most studies evaluated T2DM patients and animal models. However, the effect of T1DM on cardiac fibrosis is still unclear.9

The protein expression of myocardial extracellular matrix (ECM), especially collagen type I and III, is often elevated in T1DM and T2DM.10, 11 Excessive production and accumulation of ECM proteins 4 and an out‐off‐balance between MMPs and TIMPs is considered to be one of the main reasons of cardiac fibrosis in diabetic patients.12 Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) are the main origin of ECM proteins, and excessive deposition of ECM proteins is always accompanied by abnormal proliferation of CFs in cardiac fibrosis pathogenesis and progression.13

Endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EndMT) in endothelia cells (ECs) is an important cellular phenomenon that increases CFs and cardiac fibrosis in diabetic hearts.14, 15, 16 Fibroblast‐like cells, derived from ECs via EndMT, play a significant part in the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis.17, 18 EndMT is characterized by decreased intercellular adhesion accompanied with alteration in cell polarity 19, 20 wherein endothelial markers, for example, vascular endothelial cadherin (VE‐cadherin) and CD31 are significantly down‐regulated, while mesenchymal markers, for instance, fibroblast‐specific protein‐1 (FSP‐1) and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) are remarkably up‐regulated.21 SMADs (R‐SMADs, Co‐SMADs and I‐SMADs), main signal transducers of TGF‐β superfamily receptors, compose a protein family with homologous structure.22 SMAD2 and SMAD3 serve as R‐SMADs whereas SMAD7 belongs to I‐SMADs.22 EndMT is induced by activated TGF‐β1/SMAD, MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt, in concert with p38 MAPK signalling pathway in ECs, thereby further promoting the cardiac fibrosis phenotype of diabetic cardiomyopathy.23, 24 In contrast, inhibition of these pathways can prevent TGF‐β‐induced cardiac fibrosis.25 NF‐κB is a protein complex controls inflammation cytokine production and transcription of DNA, consisting of multiple members including RelA (p65) in mammalian cells.26 P65, encoded by RELA gene,27 is activated by fatty acids and hyperglycaemia in heart.9 Although increasing evidence suggests that high glucose concentration is associated with EndMT in ECs, the mechanism underlying the regulation of EndMT in T1DM is still unclear.28

miRNAs constitute a class of short, 20‐23‐nucleotide‐long, non‐coding RNA.29 Recently, the parts of miRNAs in cardiac fibrosis have been confirmed, thereby revealing a new mechanism underlying the regulation of cardiac diseases.30, 31 miR‐21 has been comprehensively described in fibrosis because of its target relevance and important role in the modulation of the TGF‐β1 signalling pathway, related to the pathogenesis and progression of fibrosis in various organs.32, 33, 34 The association between miR‐21 and pulmonary, renal and cardiac fibrosis has been confirmed 35, 36, 37; however, it is unclear whether miR‐21 plays a part in EndMT and perivascular fibrosis in the heart in T1DM. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the role and the mode of miR‐21 in regulating EndMT and cardiac perivascular fibrosis and to observe the influence of miR‐21 inhibition on the heart of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Antibodies

All the antibodies were purchased from Abcam Company: anti‐collagen I (ab34710), anti‐collagen III (ab7778), anti‐fibronectin (ab2413), anti‐CD31 (ab24590), anti‐SMAD7 (ab216428), anti‐p‐p65 (ab86299), anti‐p‐SMAD2 (ab53100), anti‐p‐SMAD3 (ab52903) and anti‐α‐SMA (ab5694).

2.2. T1DM model mice

8‐week‐old to 12‐week‐old male C57BL/6 mice (Wuhan Centre for Disease Control and Prevention) were used in this research. Animal care and experimental procedures were implemented according to the NIH guidelines (publication No. 85‐23, revised 1985).

A mouse model of T1DM was generated via continuous intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (S0130; STZ, Sigma‐Aldrich Trading; 50 mg/kg/d) for 5 days.38 The mice were considered to have diabetes and were used if they developed hyperglycaemia (≥12 mmol/L).

2.3. miR‐21 inhibitor treatments

For evaluating the action of miR‐21, mice were assigned to 3 groups: Control group (inhibitor NC), T1DM group (STZ + inhibitor NC) and T1DM + miR‐21 inhibitor group (STZ + miR‐21 inhibitor).

miR‐21 inhibitor (200 nmol/kg, RioboBio) and inhibitor NC (200 nmol/kg, RioboBio) were at multiple sites intramuscularly administered into the left ventricular myocardium.29

2.4. Physiological studies

At 12 weeks after STZ injection, echocardiography was carried out by a technician in a double‐blind manner using Vevo2100 High‐Resolution Micro‐Ultrasound System (Visual Sonics).

2.5. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses

After physiological assessment, mice were euthanized, hearts dissected out, heart weight (HW), bodyweight (BW) and tibial length (TL) measured, followed by calculation HW/BW and HW/TL. Masson's trichrome or Sirius red staining was executed in accordance with a previously described protocol.29 Quantitative assessments were implemented in randomly chosen areas (200×).

For immunohistochemical analysis, paraffin‐embedded sections of mice cardiac tissues were treated with high‐pressure antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (PH = 6.0). Sections were blocked in 5% BSA then incubated with primary antibodies at a dilution ratio of 1:200: anti‐ collagen I, anti‐fibronectin, anti‐collagen III, anti‐SMAD7 and anti‐p‐p65, thereafter, incubated with corresponding HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200, BL001A/BL003A; Biosharp). At last, nuclei were stained with haematoxylin. Pannoramic MIDIImage (3D HISTECH) was used to detect images of slides and Pro Plus6.0 for quantitative assessments.

2.6. In vitro analysis with HG and miR‐21 inhibitor

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; ATCC) were cultured with CC‐3162 EGM‐2 BulletKit (Lonza). Cells cultured in a 12‐well plate for 24 hours were treated with siRNA targeting p65 (RioboBio) or miR‐21 inhibitor or cotransfected with miR‐21 inhibitor and siRNA targeting SMAD7 (RioboBio) according to the instructions of lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) and Opti‐MEM reduced serum medium (Gibco Life Technologies). 6 hours later, Opti‐MEM reduced serum medium was replaced by complete cell culture medium with high concentrations of glucose (HG: 25 mmol/L D‐glucose, G5500, Sigma, Irvine, UK) and Negative Control (NC: 25 mmol/L L‐glucose, G8644, Sigma, St. Louis, USA) for 48 hours. For further verifying the regulatory effect of p65 on miR‐21, HUVECs were stimulated with 20 μmol/L p65 inhibitor Quinacrine (QC) for 48 hours.

2.7. Immunocytochemistry and immunofluorescence staining

Mouse cardiac tissues and HUVECs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. HUVECs were treated with 0.5% Triton X‐100 while cardiac tissues processed as described above, then incubated with primary anti‐α‐SMA antibody (1:200) and anti‐CD31 at 4°C after blocking with 5% BSA. The following day, cells were incubated with corresponding fluorescent antibodies: Alexa Fluor 488‐labelled Goat Anti‐Rabbit IgG (H + L) (A0423; Beyotime) and Cy3‐conjugated Goat Anti‐Mouse IgG (BA1031; Boster Biological Technology Co Ltd). Finally, nuclei were stained with DAPI. Confocal microscope was used to visualize cells.

2.8. Luciferase reporter assay

For assessing the activation of miR‐21 by p65 or the suppression of SMAD7 by miR‐21, the binding sites were mutated using the method of site directed mutagenesis. The regions containing the predicted binding sites were amplified from human genomic DNA, cut with corresponding enzymes then subcloned into pGL3‐Basic/PMIR‐Report vectors (Applied Biosystems). Subsequently, binding sites were deleted or mutated to further validate that p65 or miR‐21 play roles by targeting the binding site. Thereafter, p65‐p3xFLAG‐CMV‐10 and miR‐21‐pGL3‐Basic/miR‐21 and SMAD7‐PMIR‐Report were cotransfected into HEK293 (ATCC) with the indicated wild‐type or mutant luciferase reporter, while Renilla acted as a transfection efficiency control.

2.9. qRT‐PCR

HUVEC cells cultured in 12‐well plate were transfected with mimic/mimic NC (RioboBio), inhibitor/inhibitor NC (RioboBio) or treated with TGF‐β1 at 10 ng/mL (Sigma)/TGF‐β1+ inhibitor. 48 hours later, cells were lysed with RNAiso plus (TaKaRa), while cardiac tissues were lysed with RNAiso plus and homogenized. Total RNA was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using M‐MLV reverse transcription kit (Vazyme). qRT‐PCR was conducted with AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Q141‐02/03, Vazyme) on the ABI StepOnePlus™ Real‐Time PCR System. The primers sequence is as follows: SMAD7, 5′‐GGACGCTGTTGGTACACAAG‐3′, 5′‐GCTGCATAAACTCGTGGTCATTG‐3′; α‐SMA, 5′‐CAGGGGGCACCACTATGTAC‐3′, 5′‐CGGCTTCATCGTATTCCTGTT‐3′; CD31, 5′‐CGTGGTCAACATAACAGAACTA‐3′, 5′‐GTCCGACTTTGAGGCTATCT‐3′; β‐actin, 5′‐GGACTTCGAGCAGGAGATGG‐3′, 5′‐GCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGAGG‐3′.

For reverse transcription and qRT‐PCR analysis of miR‐21, two different Bulge‐Loop™ miRNA qRT‐PCR Primer sets were used to detect the transcriptional level of miR‐21, Bulge‐Loop™ miR‐21 qPCR Primer Set and Bulge‐Loopies™ U6 qPCR Primer Set (RioboBio).

2.10. Western blotting

Denatured cell lysates and myocardium samples were subjected to SDS‐PAGE. After blocking in 5% BSA, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies: anti‐fibronectin (1:3000), anti‐collagen I (1:5000), anti‐CD31 (1:1000), anti‐p‐SMAD2 (1:1000), anti‐collagen III (1:5000), anti‐p‐SMAD3 (1:3000), anti‐SMAD7 (1:2000) and anti‐α‐SMA (1:5000). After washing, membranes were incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies (BL001A/BL003A; Biosharp). The results were detected using ECL Plus and imaged with Quantity One (Bio‐Rad).

2.11. Statistical analyses

All the data are exhibited as mean ± SD. SPSS 19.0 (IBM) served to statistical analyses. One‐way ANOVA and Student's two‐tailed t test were used for multiple‐group comparisons and between‐group comparisons, respectively. The difference was statistically significant when P < .05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. LVEF decreased while miR‐21 increased in myocardium of T1DM mice

Fasting glucose of T1DM mice increased significantly. Echocardiography was carried out for assessing cardiac function at 12 weeks after STZ injection. LVEF decreased significantly in T1DM mice (Figure S1A,B).

For evaluating the relationship between miR‐21 and cardiac dysfunction, the mRNA level of miR‐21 was assessed. miR‐21 was up‐regulated by 2.24‐fold (P < .01) (Figure S1C) in the myocardium of T1DM mice.

3.2. Inhibiting miR‐21 ameliorated cardiac function in T1DM mice

Whether inhibition of miR‐21 repressed cardiac injury in T1DM mice was investigated upon intramuscular administration of miR‐21 inhibitor in the myocardium at 4 weeks after STZ administration. 12 weeks later, we detected the basic parameters of the three different groups including HW (mg), BW (g) and fasting glucose (mmol/L) and calculated the ratio of HW/BW (mg/g) (data not displayed) and HW/TL (mg/mm). BW (data not displayed) and fasting blood glucose of T1DM mice showed no difference whether miR‐21 inhibitor was injected or not (Figure 1A,B). LVEF deceased in T1DM mice, while miR‐21 inhibitor treatment rescued STZ‐induced cardiac injury (Figure 1C,D). Similar changes were observed in HW/TL (Figure 1E) and the ratio of E/A (Figure 1F).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Inhibiting miR‐21 ameliorated cardiac function of T1DM mice. A, The map of the exhibition of the assay method. B, The measurement of fasting glucose (mmol/L). **P < .01 vs Control, NS vs STZ (NS, no significant difference). C, Typical echocardiograms of two‐dimensional echocardiography, M‐mode. D, The measurement of LVEF. E, The ratio of HW/TL (mg/mm). F, The ratio of E/A. **P < .01 vs Control, **P < .01 vs STZ. n = 8 per group

3.3. Inhibition of miR‐21 repressed cardiac mesenchymal fibrosis and perivascular fibrosis via suppressing EndMT in T1DM mice

Masson's and Sirius red staining revealed that production of the extracellular matrix was significantly increased in the myocardium in T1DM mice. Cardiac fibrosis and collagen deposition were raised by 3.83‐fold (P < .01) and 2.58‐fold (P < .01) in T1DM mice. After miR‐21 inhibition, cardiac fibrosis and collagen deposition were decreased by 0.67‐fold (P < .01) and 0.76‐fold (P < .01). (Figure 2A,B).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

In T1DM mice, inhibiting miR‐21 repressed STZ‐induced myocardial mesenchymal fibrosis and perivascular fibrosis. A, Masson staining of myocardial mesenchyme and the percentage of mesenchymal fibrosis. B, Sirius red staining of myocardial mesenchyme and the percentage of mesenchymal collagen. C, Masson staining of myocardial peripheral vessel and the percentage of perivascular fibrosis. D, Sirius red staining of myocardial peripheral vessel and the percentage of perivascular collagen. **P < .01 vs Control, **P < .01 vs STZ. n = 8 per group

Cardiac perivascular fibrosis also plays a pivotal part in cardiac dysfunction caused by hyperglycaemia. Therefore, the effects of miR‐21 inhibitor on cardiac perivascular fibrosis were evaluated. Masson's trichrome and Sirius red staining of cardiac peripheral vessels demonstrated that ECM production was increased in the hearts of T1DM mice. Perivascular fibrosis (4.14‐fold, P < .01) and collagen deposition (2.86‐fold, P < .01) were enhanced remarkably in T1DM mice. However, miR‐21 inhibition reduced perivascular fibrosis and collagen deposition by 0.64‐fold (P < .01) and 0.61‐fold (P < .01) (Figure 2C,D).

Diabetes mellitus up‐regulated fibrotic markers collagen I, collagen III in addition to fibronectin, but miR‐21 inhibitor reduced cardiac fibrosis (Figure 3A). Furthermore, Western blotting revealed that collagen I (P < .01), collagen III (P < .01) and fibronectin (P < .01) were prominently up‐regulated in T1DM mice while markedly down‐regulated upon miR‐21 inhibition (collagen I, P < .01; collagen III, P < .01; fibronectin, P < .01) (Figure 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Fibrotic markers were increased in T1DM mice. A, Immunohistochemical staining of collagen I, collagen III and fibronectin. B, Western blotting of collagen I, collagen III and fibronectin in cardiac tissues. **P < .01 vs Control, **P < .01 vs STZ. n = 8 per group

Endothelial cells lost their features during EndMT, for instance, CD31 expression, but acquired mesenchymal features, for example, α‐SMA expression. For estimating the action of miR‐21 inhibition on EndMT in the myocardium of T1DM mice, immunofluorescence co‐staining of CD31 and α‐SMA and western blotting assays were performed. We found that CD31 was markedly down‐regulated in myocardial vessels in T1DM mice; this down‐regulation was reversed upon administration of miR‐21 inhibitor. In contrast, mesenchymal marker α‐SMA was up‐regulated in cardiac tissues of T1DM mice; however, this up‐regulation was reversed upon miR‐21 inhibition (Figure 4A,B). These results suggest that miR‐21 inhibition may partially alleviate EndMT in the heart of T1DM mice.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

miR‐21 inhibition alleviated the fibrosis of myocardial peripheral vessels in T1DM mice. A, Immunofluorescence co‐staining of CD31 and α‐SMA in cardiac tissues. B, Western blotting of CD31 and α‐SMA in myocardial tissues. **P < .01 vs Control, **P < .01 vs STZ. n = 8 per group

3.4. Inhibiting miR‐21 attenuated the STZ‐induced SMAD pathway in the cardiac tissues in T1DM mice

Previous studies have reported that miR‐21 is of key importance in CFs activation and cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction by targeting SMAD7.39 Herein, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that SMAD7 was significantly down‐regulated in T1DM mice, while inhibition of miR‐21 up‐regulated SMAD7 in perivascular tissue in diabetic myocardium (Figure 5A,B). Western blotting revealed that p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3 were markedly up‐regulated, while SMAD7 was observably down‐regulated in T1DM mice. However, in miR‐21 inhibitor‐treated mice, the activation of p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3 was markedly reduced, but that of SMAD7 was observably increased. The results indicated that inhibition of miR‐21 may suppress the activation of the p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3 pathway in the heart of T1DM mice via up‐regulation of SMAD7 (Figure 5C,D).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

miR‐21 inhibition attenuated the STZ‐induced SMAD pathway in the myocardial tissues in T1DM mice. (A,B) Immunohistochemical staining of SMAD7 in cardiac tissues. (C,D) Western blotting of p‐SMAD2, p‐SMAD3 and SMAD7 in cardiac tissues. **P < .01 vs Control, **P < .01 vs STZ. n = 8 per group

3.5. miR‐21 is positively regulated by p65

Because blood glucose is elevated in patients and mice with T1DM, HUVECs treated with high glucose concentrations were used to elucidate the mechanism underlying changes in myocardial miR‐21 expression in T1DM mice.

Immunohistochemical results of p‐p65 in mouse cardiac tissues confirmed that the expression of p‐p65 was activated in T1DM mice (Figure 6A). Conservatism prediction revealed that the binding site of p65 is evolutionarily conserved across taxa (Figure 6B). The results of qRT‐PCR revealed that miR‐21 was markedly up‐regulated upon treatment with HG and evidently down‐regulated after siRNA for p65 (Figure 6C) or after treatment with p65 inhibitor QC (Figure 6D).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

miR‐21 is positively regulated by p65. A, Immunohistochemical staining of p‐p65 in cardiac tissues, n = 8 per group. B, The binding site of p65 and the conservatism prediction of the binding site in different species. (C,D) The expression of miR‐21 in HUVECs. (E,F) Luciferase activity of miR‐21 in HEK293 cells

TRED database was used for retrieving the sequence of the miR‐21 promoter and regulatory region. Via PROMO 3.0 and ConTraV2, we identified that the physical position −470 to −461 at the 5′‐UTR of miR‐21 was the binding site for p65 (Figure 6E). The luciferase activity of miR‐21 was significantly increased under the action of p65, which was decreased upon deletion p65 binding site (Figure 6F).

3.6. SMAD7 is directly regulated by miR‐21 in HUVECs

SMAD7 is directly regulated by miR‐21 in CFs and mesenchymal stem cells, however, whether it is still the direct target of miR‐21 in HUVECs remains unclear and how the pathophysiology regulation mode of perivascular fibrosis is.

Herein, TargetScan7.2 was used to identify potential target genes regulating fibrosis. SMAD7 is one of the candidate target genes related to EndMT with an 8‐nucleotide binding site in different species (Figure S2A). To determine whether miR‐21 inhibits SMAD7 expression by binding to the 3′‐UTR, qRT‐PCR was carried out to investigate the effect of miR‐21 on the expression of SMAD7 in HUVECs. The results indicated that SMAD7 mRNA levels remained largely unchanged (Figure S2B). Furthermore, the luciferase activation of WT was significantly repressed by miR‐21 compared with the mutant SMAD7 (Figure S2C,D). Western blotting revealed that SMAD7 was significantly down‐regulated when treated with miR‐21 (Figure S2E,F), while notably up‐regulated when treated with miR‐21 inhibitor in HUVECs (Figure S2E,F). All results suggested that SMAD7 is directly regulated by miR‐21 in HUVECs.

3.7. miR‐21 inhibition repressed HG‐mediated EndMT in vitro via regulation of SMAD pathway

Western blotting revealed that CD31 and SMAD7 were markedly down‐regulated (P < .01) with the increase in glucose concentration; however, α‐SMA was significantly up‐regulated (P < .01) in HUVECs, which was confirmed by immunofluorescence of CD31 and α‐SMA. Moreover, p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3 were significantly activated by HG. These events were reversed upon treatment with miR‐21 inhibitor. After siRNA‐mediated knockdown of SMAD7, the protective effect of miR‐21 inhibition was diminished (Figure 7A‐C). miR‐21 inhibition also prevented EndMT caused by TGF‐β1 (10 ng/mL) (Figure S3). These results indicated that miR‐21 inhibitor may inhibit EndMT in vitro.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

miR‐21 inhibitor suppressed HG‐induced EndMT via regulating SMAD pathway. (A,B) Western blotting of CD31, α‐SMA, SMAD7, p‐SMAD2 and p‐SMAD3 in HUVECs. C, Immunofluorescent staining of CD31 and α‐SMA in HUVECs

4. DISCUSSION

Previous reports have confirmed that miR‐21 is closely related to organ fibrosis induced by diabetes mellitus. Clinic and animal studies revealed a significant increase in miR‐21 in plasma and urine of patients with T1DM, and up‐regulation of plasma miR‐21 levels in young diabetic patients may be an indicator of fibrosis remodelling that already exists.40 It is well known that miR‐21 can induce fibrosis in many organs, for instance, kidney and heart 41, 42 and promote collagen synthesis in fibroblasts treated with HG.43

We observed that increased miR‐21 may induce both cardiac mesenchymal fibrosis and cardiac perivascular fibrosis through SMAD7 signalling pathway and inhibition of miR‐21 decreased cardiac fibrosis induced by hyperglycaemia and prevented cardiac structural and functional abnormalities in T1DM mice. Furthermore, we identified a highly conserved binding site of NF‐κB in miR‐21 5′‐UTR and demonstrated that HG up‐regulated miR‐21 in HUVECs via up‐regulation of p65.

The action of EndMT in diabetic myocardial fibrosis has been confirmed in both T1DM and T2DM mice.14 Endothelial injury resulting from hyperglycaemia causes phenotypic changes in EndMT, playing a vital part in the process of myocardial fibrosis 44 EndMT participates in cell initiation of myofibroblasts and in ECM proteins secretion during the occurrence and development of myocardial fibrosis, which is a unique feature of dilated cardiomyopathy.20

In the present study, endothelial marker was down‐regulated and fibroblast marker up‐regulated, and these changes are correlated with miR‐21 up‐regulation.

miR‐21 has a wide range of functions. By targeting PDCD4, miR‐21 participated in preventing cardiomyocyte death.45 FasL or PTEN belonging to anti‐apoptotic gene is also the target of miR‐21.46 miR‐21 participates in the process of angiogenesis and repair of inflammation or ischaemic injury by reducing NF‐κB or through PTEN/AKT/ERK1‐VEGF pathway.46 Excessive expression of miR‐21 in bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells can effectively repair myocardial injury in rats.47 In the upstream, miR‐21 was regulated by HIF1A,48 binding together with PER2, which is vital for regulating HIF1A target genes, in hypoxia.49

SMAD7 is directly regulated by miR‐21 in CFs.39 A population genetic research reported that SMAD7 may be associated with the pathogenesis of T1DM and T2DM. In T2DM, an intronic variant IVS2‐21 C > T of SMAD7 is associated with the disease under the recessive genetic model.50 Merriman et al suggested an association between chromosome 18q12‐q21 region (SMAD7 locates) with T1DM in 882 families,51 and Barrett et al confirmed the association between rs12953717, a tag SNP (P = 10−6) for SMAD7, and T1DM in a genome‐wide association study among Caucasians.52 Furthermore, a study involving 928 T1DM patients and 922 control patients revealed that three genes, including SMAD7, were down‐regulated in T1DM patients.53

In HUVECs, SMAD7 was confirmed remains a direct target of miR‐21. SMAD7 was down‐regulated; however, miR‐21 up‐regulated significantly in the myocardium of T1DM mice, while these changes were reversed after inhibiting miR‐21. Together, inhibition of miR‐21 may up‐regulate SMAD7 and improve both cardiac mesenchymal fibrosis and cardiac perivascular fibrosis, thereby promoting myocardial function in T1DM.

SMAD7 attenuates TGF‐β/SMAD signal transduction, which is reported to be a classic pathway to participate in the activation of EndMT.54 The specific receptors (TGF‐βRI/TGF‐βRII) of TGF‐β are activated by TGF‐β, subsequently stimulating phosphorylation of SMAD2 and SMAD3.55 Complexes formed by p‐SMAD2, p‐SMAD3 and SMAD4 translocate from cytoplasm to nucleus regulating downstream targets containing SMAD7.56

Herein, SMAD7 was down‐regulated, whereas the phosphorylation of SMAD2 and SMAD3 enhanced in the myocardium in T1DM mice and in HUVECs. In addition, endothelial marker was down‐regulated and fibroblast marker up‐regulated, suggesting that hyperglycaemia‐induced EndMT may play a part of the function in cardiac perivascular fibrosis in T1DM. Inhibition of miR‐21 significantly decreased high glucose‐induced EndMT in HUVECs, while SMAD7 knockdown blunted the effect of miR‐21 inhibitor. These results suggested that inhibition of miR‐21 may reverse hyperglycaemia‐induced cardiac perivascular fibrosis via regulation of SMAD7.

In the present study, a model was proposed to interpret the action of miR‐21 in perivascular fibrosis caused by hyperglycaemia (Figure S4). Overall, hyperglycaemia up‐regulated miR‐21, followed by down‐regulation of its target SMAD7, which, in turn, enhanced the phosphorylation of SMAD2 and SMAD3, thereby promoting EndMT activation and myocardial fibrosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal the part of miR‐21 in regulating myocardial perivascular fibrosis in T1DM.

Our study has the following limitations. Although the results suggest that miR‐21 plays an important regulatory part in cardiac perivascular fibrosis, the relationship between miR‐21 and SMAD7 did not display one‐to‐one stoichiometry. Furthermore, miRNAs have numerous target genes, and our study has not ruled out the possibility that miR‐21 promotes the pathogenesis of cardiac perivascular fibrosis by simultaneously targeting other genes in T1DM; the present results merely confirm that SMAD7 brings into play in this process. In the future research, the role of miR‐21 and other target genes besides SMAD7 in the EndMT process and the specific molecular mechanism will be focused on. More importantly, our existing research lacks an endothelial cell (EC)‐specific miR‐21 knockout mice experiments, since miR‐21 inhibitor is known to have little or no specificity for cell types when administered to mice in vivo. Therefore, further experimental studies are needed to address this issue. Although population‐level evidence confirms that both miR‐21 and SMAD7 are closely associated with T1DM and T2DM, whether SMAD7 expression is affected by miR‐21 in the long‐term, and the exact role of miR‐21 and SMAD7 in myocardial fibrosis and heart failure in patients with T1DM needs more evidence in the future prospective clinic studies. Since STZ‐induced diabetic mice exhibited changes in cardiac systolic function at 857 or 12 weeks,58 in the present research, the changes of cardiac systolic function were detected at 12 weeks after induction of T1DM. Diabetes mellitus has chronic and long‐term cardiac damage, so the long‐term effects of miR‐21 inhibitor on diabetic cardiac injury (24 and 36 weeks) need to be evaluated in future.

This study indicated that inhibiting miR‐21 may prevent myocardial perivascular fibrosis and ameliorate myocardial function of T1DM partially by inhibiting EndMT. Potential mechanism may involve NF‐κB/miR‐21/SMAD7 signalling pathway. The precise potential mechanism is yet unclear, but inhibition of miR‐21 may be a lurking therapeutic target for diabetic cardiac complications and multiple organ damage. Furthermore, EndMT contributes to fibrosis pathogenesis in different organs, inhibition of miR‐21 may be a new therapeutic target for multiple organ damage in diabetes mellitus.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Q‐QL, Y‐FY and XT designed the research, carried out the data analysis, wrote the paper and assisted in preparation of the manuscript; Q‐QL, Y‐FY, S‐MS, M‐CZ, Y‐CZ and M‐RW carried out the experimental work;; JC, Z‐RH, W‐LZ, ML, and QW revised the manuscript critically.

Supporting information

 

Click here for additional data file. (812KB, doc)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81870176, No. 91439109 and No. 81700302) and Project of National Key Laboratory for Cardiovascular Diseases (No. 2018kf‐01).

Li Q, Yao Y, Shi S, et al. Inhibition of miR‐21 alleviated cardiac perivascular fibrosis via repressing EndMT in T1DM. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:910–920. 10.1111/jcmm.14800

Li and Yao contributed equally to the work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Lind M, Bounias I, Olsson M, et al. Glycaemic control and incidence of heart failure in 20,985 patients with type 1 diabetes: an observational study. Lancet. 2011;378:140‐146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405‐412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu X, Mujahid H, Rong B, et al. Irisin inhibits high glucose‐induced endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition and exerts a dose‐dependent bidirectional effect on diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Cell Mol Med. 2018; 22(2):808‐822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Asbun J, Villarreal FJ. The pathogenesis of myocardial fibrosis in the setting of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:693‐700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ozturk N, Olgar Y, Ozdemir S. Trace elements in diabetic cardiomyopathy: an electrophysiological overview. World J Diabetes. 2013;4:92‐100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:29‐34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kanamori H, Takemura G, Goto K, et al. Autophagic adaptations in diabetic cardiomyopathy differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Autophagy. 2015;11:1146‐1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shimizu M, Umeda K, Sugihara N, et al. Collagen remodelling in myocardia of patients with diabetes. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46:32‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Jia G, DeMarco VG, Sowers JR. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:144‐153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ritchie RH, Love JE, Huynh K, et al. Enhanced phosphoinositide 3‐kinase(p110alpha) activity prevents diabetes‐induced cardiomyopathy and superoxide generation in a mouse model of diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012;55:3369‐3381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ritchie RH, Leo CH, Qin C, et al. Low intrinsic exercise capacity in rats predisposes to age‐dependent cardiac remodeling independent of macrovascular function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304:H729‐H739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Westermann D, Rutschow S, Jager S, et al. Contributions of inflammation and cardiac matrix metalloproteinase activity to cardiac failure in diabetic cardiomyopathy: the role of angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonism. Diabetes. 2007;56:641‐646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tao H, Shi KH, Yang JJ, et al. Epigenetic regulation of cardiac fibrosis. Cell Signal. 2013;25:1932‐1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sharma V, Dogra N, Saikia UN, Khullar M. Transcriptional regulation of endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in cardiac fibrosis: role of myocardin‐related transcription factor A and activating transcription factor 3. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;95:1263‐1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Singh VP, Le B, Khode R, et al. Intracellular angiotensin II production in diabetic rats is correlated with cardiomyocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, and cardiac fibrosis. Diabetes. 2008;57:3297‐3306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Widyantoro B, Emoto N, Nakayama K, et al. Endothelial cell‐derived endothelin‐1 promotes cardiac fibrosis in diabetic hearts through stimulation of endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition. Circulation. 2010;121:2407‐2418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Okayama K, Azuma J, Dosaka N, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor reduces cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting endothelial‐mesenchymal transition. Hypertension. 2012;59:958‐965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Li Y, Lui KO, Zhou B. Reassessing endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15:445‐456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chen Y, Yang Q, Zhan Y, et al. The role of miR‐328 in high glucose‐induced endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Life Sci. 2018;207:110‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sanchez‐Duffhues G, Garcia de Vinuesa A, Ten Dijke P. Endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in cardiovascular diseases: developmental signaling pathways gone awry. Dev Dyn. 2018;247:492‐508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Jackson AO, Zhang J, Jiang Z, Yin K. Endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition: A novel therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27:383‐393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Massague J, Seoane J, Wotton D. Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 2005;19:2783‐2810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Diamant M, Lamb HJ, Smit JW, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes is associated with the metabolic syndrome and systemic inflammation. Diabetologia. 2005;48:1669‐1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tschope C, Walther T, Escher F, et al. Transgenic activation of the kallikrein‐kinin system inhibits intramyocardial inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress in experimental diabetic cardiomyopathy. FASEB J. 2005;19:2057‐2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cooley BC, Nevado J, Mellad J, et al. TGF‐beta signaling mediates endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EndMT) during vein graft remodeling. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:227ra34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nabel GJ, Verma IM. Proposed NF‐kappa B/I kappa B family nomenclature. Genes Dev. 1993;7:2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nolan GP, Ghosh S, Liou HC, et al. DNA binding and I kappa B inhibition of the cloned p65 subunit of NF‐kappa B, a rel‐related polypeptide. Cell. 1991;64:961‐969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yu CH, Suriguga GM, et al. High glucose induced endothelial to mesenchymal transition in human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Exp Mol Pathol. 2017;102:377‐383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yao Y, Lu Q, Hu Z, et al. A non‐canonical pathway regulates ER stress signaling and blocks ER stress‐induced apoptosis and heart failure. Nat Commun. 2017;8:133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Huang Y, Xu T, Li J. Role of miR‐208 in cardiac fibrosis: prevention or promotion? Arch Med Res. 2014;45:356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Chen S, Puthanveetil P, Feng B, et al. Cardiac miR‐133a overexpression prevents early cardiac fibrosis in diabetes. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18(3):415‐421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Adam O, Lohfelm B, Thum T, et al. Role of miR‐21 in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrosis. Basic Res Cardiol. 2012;107:278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhong X, Chung AC, Chen HY, et al. Smad3‐mediated upregulation of miR‐21 promotes renal fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22:1668‐1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang J, He F, Chen L, et al. Resveratrol inhibits pulmonary fibrosis by regulating miR‐21 through MAPK/AP‐1 pathways. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:37‐44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Izawa T, Horiuchi T, Atarashi M, et al. Anti‐fibrotic role of miR‐214 in thioacetamide‐induced liver cirrhosis in rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2015;43:844‐851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Lai S, Iwakiri Y. Is miR‐21 a potent target for liver fibrosis? Hepatology. 2018;67:2082‐2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zhou XL, Xu H, Liu ZB, et al. miR‐21 promotes cardiac fibroblast‐to‐myofibroblast transformation and myocardial fibrosis by targeting Jagged1. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(8):3816‐3824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tong J, Lai Y, Yao YA, et al. Qiliqiangxin rescues mouse cardiac function by regulating AGTR1/TRPV1‐mediated autophagy in STZ‐induced diabetes mellitus. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;47:1365‐1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yuan J, Chen H, Ge D, et al. miR‐21 promotes cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction via targeting SMAD7. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42:2207‐2219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Osipova J, Fischer DC, Dangwal S, et al. Diabetes‐associated microRNAs in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross‐sectional cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E1661‐E1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Thum T, Gross C, Fiedler J, et al. microRNA‐21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts. Nature. 2008;456:980‐984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Chau BN, Xin C, Hartner J, et al. MicroRNA‐21 promotes fibrosis of the kidney by silencing metabolic pathways. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:121ra18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liu S, Li W, Xu M, et al. micro‐RNA 21Targets dual specific phosphatase 8 to promote collagen synthesis in high glucose‐treated primary cardiac fibroblasts. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:1689‐1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Feng B, Cao Y, Chen S, et al. miR‐200b mediates endothelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes. 2016;65:768‐779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Xiao J, Pan Y, Li XH, et al. Cardiac progenitor cell‐derived exosomes prevent cardiomyocytes apoptosis through exosomal miR‐21 by targeting PDCD4. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu X, Kriegel AJ, Jiao X, et al. miR‐21 in ischemia/reperfusion injury: a double‐edged sword? Physiol Genomics. 2014;46:789‐797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zeng YL, Zheng H, Chen QR, et al. Bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing miR‐21 efficiently repair myocardial damage in rats. Oncotarget. 2017;8:29161‐29173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Adamovich Y, Ladeuix B, Golik M, et al. Rhythmic oxygen levels reset circadian clocks through HIF1alpha. Cell Metab. 2017;25:93‐101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Eckle T, Hartmann K, Bonney S, et al. Adora2b‐elicited Per2 stabilization promotes a HIF‐dependent metabolic switch crucial for myocardial adaptation to ischemia. Nat Med. 2012;18:774‐782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Gutierrez‐Aguilar R, Benmezroua Y, Balkau B, et al. Minor contribution of SMAD7 and KLF10 variants to genetic susceptibility of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2007;33:372‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Merriman TR, Cordell HJ, Eaves IA, et al. Suggestive evidence for association of human chromosome 18q12‐q21 and its orthologue on rat and mouse chromosome 18 with several autoimmune diseases. Diabetes. 2001;50:184‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Barrett JC, Dunham I, Birney E. Using human genetics to make new medicines. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:561‐562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jin Y, Sharma A, Carey C, et al. The expression of inflammatory genes is upregulated in peripheral blood of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2794‐2802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ghosh AK, Quaggin SE, Vaughan DE. Molecular basis of organ fibrosis: potential therapeutic approaches. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2013;238:461‐481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Pardali E, Ten Dijke P. TGFbeta signaling and cardiovascular diseases. Int J Biol Sci. 2012;8:195‐213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Yan X, Liu Z, Chen Y. Regulation of TGF‐beta signaling by Smad7. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2009;41:263‐272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Suzuki H, Kayama Y, Sakamoto M, et al. Arachidonate 12/15‐lipoxygenase‐induced inflammation and oxidative stress are involved in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Diabetes. 2015;64:618‐630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Akula A, Kota MK, Gopisetty SG, et al. Biochemical, histological and echocardiographic changes during experimental cardiomyopathy in STZ‐induced diabetic rats. Pharmacol Res. 2003;48:429‐435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

 

Click here for additional data file. (812KB, doc)

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.

Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES