Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 20;9:1441. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01441

Table 2.

Meta-analyses of MET protein over-expression and survival of surgically resected NSCLC.

N of studies Model HR (95% CI) Log-rank p Heterogeneity (p, I2) Conclusion
C-MET OS 15 Random 1.623 (1.176–2.240) 0.003 <0.001, 85.9% Positive
P-MET OS 3 Random 1.710 (0.823–3.533) 0.15 0.006, 80.2% Negative
Asian OS 12 Random 2.115 (1.440–3.108) <0.001 <0.001, 83.5% Positive
Non-Asian OS 4 Random 0.901 (0.586–1.387) 0.637 0.002, 80.0% Negative
Japanese OS 5 Random 1.985 (0.970–4.058) 0.06 <0.001, 82.1% Negative
Chinese OS 5 Random 2.627 (1.123–6.146) 0.026 <0.001, 90.1% Positive
ADCC OS 5 Fixed 2.220 (1.607–3.066) <0.001 0.781, 0% Positive
RM OS 7 Random 1.107 (0.777–1.579) 0.573 <0.001, 78.9% Negative
RM (SP44) OS 5 Random 1.031 (0.668–1.590) 0.892 0.001, 78.1% Negative
H-score 4 Random 1.014 (0.822–1.251) 0.893 0.001, 0.893 Negative
RP OS 5 Fixed 2.107 (1.573–2.823) <0.001 0.521, 0% Positive
MVA OS 10 Random 2.004 (1.229–3.268) 0.005 <0.001, 88.4% Positive
UVA OS 5 Random 1.051 (0.745–1.484) 0.776 0.010, 69.7% Negative

N, Number; HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval; OS, Overall Survival; ADCC, Adenocarcinoma; RM, Rabbit Monoclonal; RP, Rabbit Polyclonal; MM, Mouse Monoclonal.