Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 26;19:340. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1543-8

Table 3.

Hierarchal regression analysis of SDMT performance

Model R R2 ΔR2 Significance
1a 0.283 0.080 0.063 p = 0.038
2b 0.312 0.097 0.062 p = 0.331
3c 0.322 0.103 0.049 p = 0.404
4d 0.335 0.112 0.059 p = 0.361
5e 0.768 0.590 0.543 p < 0.001
6f 0.902 0.813 0.786 p < 0.001

aGroup;

bGroup*HADS-Depression;

cGroup*HADS-Depression*Years of Education

dGroup*HADS-Depression*Years of Education*Mean Saccade Distance in the key area

eGroup*HADS-Depression*Years of Education*Mean Saccade Distance in the key area*Number of Visits to the Key per response;

fGroup*HADS-Depression*Years of Education*Mean Saccade Distance in the key area * Number of Visits to the Key per response* Total number of fixations in test area