Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;20(Suppl 23):634. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3295-2

Table 4.

Performance comparison between iProDNA-CapsNet and other state-of-the-art methods

Method Setting ACC (%) SN (%) SP (%) PR (%) MCC
BindN Unknown 79.15 45.64 80.90 11.12 0.143
ProteDNA Unknown 95.11 4.77 99.84 60.30 0.160
MetaDBSite Unknown 90.41 34.20 93.35 21.22 0.221
DP-Bind Unknown 81.40 61.72 82.43 15.53 0.241
DNABind Unknown 79.78 70.16 80.28 15.70 0.264
BindN+ FPR ≈ 5% 91.58 24.11 95.11 a 20.51 0.178
FPR ≈ 15% 83.69 50.81 85.41 15.42 0.213
TargetDNA FPR ≈ 5% 90.89 45.50 a 93.27 26.13 0.300
FPR ≈ 15% 84.52 b 60.22 85.79 b 18.16 0.269
iProDNA-CapsNet FPR ≈ 5% 92.38 a 42.17 94.93 29.78 a 0.315 a
FPR ≈ 15% 84.05 65.38 b 85.00 18.17 b 0.285 b

Values which are significantly higher than the others are in bold with aFPR ≈ 5% and bFPR ≈ 15%