Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Pediatr Res. 2019 Oct 17;6(2):31. doi: 10.35248/2385-4529.19.6.31

Table 4.

Prevalence and concordance of FASD diagnoses across the four diagnostic systems.

Diagnoses generated by the four systems and the various names applied to each

Variables FAS,
FASD/with Face
PFAS SE/AE,
ARND-severe*,
FASD/no Face
ND/AE,
ARND-moderate**
ARBD “FASD”
FASD
Not FASD
(includes At-Risk)

N % N % N % N % N % N % N %

Number diagnosed by each system

4 Digit 29 2.1 53 3.8 388 27.9 624 44.8 1094 78.6 299 21.4

Australian 25 1.8 372 26.7 397 28.5 995 71.5

Canada 25 1.8 201 14.4 226 16.2 1166 83.8

Hoyme 89 6.4 207 14.9 69 5.0 192 13.8 56 4 613 44 779 56.0

Number diagnosed by at least 1 system

107 7.7 241 17.3 430 30.9 624 44.8 56 4 1138 81.8 1240 89.0

Number diagnosed by all 4 systems

12 0.9 19 1.4 53 3.8 0 0 0 0 152 10.9 235 16.9
*

ARND-severe: patients with 3 or more functional domains −2 SDs below the mean.

**

ARND-moderate: patients with 2 or more functional domains −1.5 SDs below the mean, but less than 3 functional domains −2 SDs below the mean. “FASD”: 4-Digit Code includes FAS and PFAS under the FASD umbrella, but notes SE/AE and ND/AE are only FASDs if a patient’s prenatal alcohol exposure caused their SE or ND.