Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2018 Dec 4;63(23):235020. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaefd2

Table 2.

Classification results for each of the three tested approaches for each pairing of classes as well as the overall performance. On average, the 3D method yields the highest classification accuracy, followed by the 2D analysis of the segmented image area.

2D Squares 2D Segmented 3D Segmented
Ages 0.7376 0.6291 0.7940
Genotypes 0.5708 0.7292 0.8403
Treatments 0.6985 0.7872 0.7372
Overall 0.6779 0.7151 0.7860