Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 21;394(10216):2263–2270. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32518-8

Table 2.

Aortic root diameter

Placebo Irbesartan Difference (95% CI) p value
Change in aortic root systolic diameter, mm per year, mean (95% CI) 0·74 (0·60 to 0·89) 0·53 (0·39 to 0·67) −0·22 (−0·41 to −0·02) 0·030
Aortic root diameter, mm
Baseline, mean (SD), n 34·4 (5·8), 88 34·4 (5·5), 104 .. ..
1 year, mean (95% CI), n 35·3 (34·4 to 36·1), 85 34·5 (33·6 to 35·3), 94 −0·82 (−1·33 to −0·30) 0·0017
2 years, mean (95% CI), n 35·9 (35·0 to 36·8), 77 35·2 (34·3 to 36·0), 85 −0·75 (−1·41 to −0·10) 0·024
3 years, mean (95% CI), n 36·5 (35·7 to 37·4), 71 35·9 (35·0 to 36·7), 79 −0·67 (−1·32 to −0·03) 0·041
4 years, mean (95% CI), n 37·1 (36·2 to 38·1), 57 36·2 (35·3 to 37·1), 57 −0·95 (−1·86 to −0·05) 0·038
5 years, mean (95% CI), n 39·2 (38·0 to 40·4), 29 37·8 (36·7 to 39·0), 29 −1·37 (−2·83 to 0·08) 0·065

Comparisons are made between groups at each timepoint. At the final follow-up visit the majority of patients had not reached 5 years of study participation, which accounts for the sharp decrease in numbers available for follow-up between year 4 and 5.