Table 2.
Proportional odds mixed model for swing fitted with Laplace Approximation. The estimates display the effects of the manipulations and musicians’ categories. As references, the original version of a piece and the group non-jazz musicians were used.
| SE | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | |||
| exaggerated | −1.490 | 0.242 | 0.001 |
| inverted | -0.287 | 0.236 | 0.224 |
| quantized | 0.503 | 0.241 | 0.037 |
| Musicians’ Category | |||
| amateur jazz | 0.043 | 0.325 | 0.895 |
| professional jazz | −1.815 | 0.341 | 0.001 |
| semiprof. jazz | -0.449 | 0.393 | 0.254 |
| Condition x | |||
| Musicians’ Category | |||
| exagg. x amateur jazz | −0.092 | 0.331 | 0.781 |
| invert. x amateur jazz | −0.138 | 0.328 | 0.674 |
| quant. x amateur jazz | −0.008 | 0.335 | 0.982 |
| exagg. x prof. jazz | −0.642 | 0.368 | 0.082 |
| invert. x prof. jazz | −0.356 | 0.345 | 0.302 |
| quant. x prof. jazz | 0.100 | 0.345 | 0.775 |
| exagg. x semiprof. jazz | −0.354 | 0.404 | 0.380 |
| invert. x semiprof. jazz | −0.036 | 0.399 | 0.929 |
| quant. x semiprof. jazz | 0.269 | 0.409 | 0.510 |
| Threshold coefficients | Estimate | SE | |
| 12 | −2.961 | 0.300 | |
| 23 | −0.934 | 0.291 | |
| 34 | 1.027 | 0.291 | |