Table 2.
Concordance correlation coefficients for OSEM reconstructions for patients whose unaltered activity ratio was > 90%
| AR (%) | BW | StD | ENT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 vs. | CCC | Cb | r | CCC | Cb | r | CCC | Cb | r |
| 80 | 0.820 | 0.853 | 0.961 | 0.856 | 0.870 | 0.984 | 0.970 | 0.974 | 0.996 |
| 70 | 0.653 | 0.700 | 0.933 | 0.578 | 0.630 | 0.918 | 0.879 | 0.889 | 0.989 |
| 60 | 0.473 | 0.536 | 0.882 | 0.279 | 0.407 | 0.685 | 0.729 | 0.756 | 0.965 |
| 50 | 0.362 | 0.433 | 0.836 | 0.168 | 0.289 | 0.582 | 0.653 | 0.671 | 0.973 |
AR activity ratio, BW bandwidth, StD standard deviation, ENT entropy, CCC concordance correlation coefficient, Cb bias correction factor, r Pearson’s correlation coefficient