Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1423–1429. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1851-2

Table 2.

Free-text responses from Rounds 1 and 2 of the Delphi process. The text has been lightly edited for clarity and to preserve anonymity

Round 1
 Findings that predict aggressiveness and the presence of bland thrombus would be good to include but may be difficult for some radiologists; hence, I categorized these as optional features. Necrosis should be optional because of the confusion over the exact meaning and lack of pathological correlate for necrosis
 The presence of calcification should be optional
 We should consider including polar location, local extent of disease (hilar invasion, collecting system invasion, contacts Gerota’s fascia, invasion through Gerota’s fascia, invasion of adjacent organs), venous invasion, enlarged lymph nodes, and distant metastases
 Nephrometry score probably should be an optional feature
 Differentiating urothelial from cortical origin probably should be a core or optional feature
 Optional features might include vascular anomalies (if any) and the total number of lesions
 Multiphase MRI or multiphase CT is necessary for subclassifying a renal mass
 The location in the vertical axis (upper pole/interpolar/lower pole) needs to be a core descriptor
 We may want to break down fat into macroscopic fat and microscopic fat
 We include the ‘clear cell RCC likelihood score,’ but I understand this is uncommon at this point
 Consider differentiating free-floating IVC tumor thrombus from invasive (i.e., into wall) IVC tumor thrombus
 Length of tumor thrombus should be added
Round 2
 It is important to report bland thrombus [21]
 Components of the RENAL Nephrometry score (endophytic/exophytic, nearness to hilum/collecting system, location relative to polar lines, anterior/posterior) [17, 18] is important and should be included in the core template for indeterminate renal masses that may proceed to partial nephrectomy or ablation. These factors are not as important if the size/location of the mass precludes partial nephrectomy
 Consider including tumor margins: round vs. lobular vs. infiltrative
 Considering including whether tumor calcifications are present or absent
 Consider including tumor heterogeneity