Table 2.
Inclusion of RE-AIM indicators across all studies
| RE-AIM Dimension | RE-AIM Indicators | N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Reach | Described target population | 29 (100.0) |
| Demographic & behavioral information | 23 (79.3) | |
| Method to identify target population | 23 (79.3) | |
| Recruitment Strategies | 17 (58.6) | |
| Inclusion criteria | 25 (86.2) | |
| Exclusion criteria | 24 (82.7) | |
| Number eligible and invited (exposed) to recruitment | 18 (62.1) | |
| Sample size | 29 (100.0) | |
| Participation rate | 18 (62.2) | |
| Demographic comparisons between sample and population | 4 (13.8) | |
| Statistically significant comparisons between sample and population | 3 (10.3) | |
| Cost of recruitment | 0 (0.0) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure reach | 0 (0.0) | |
| Effectiveness/Efficacy | Results at program completion | 29 (100.0) |
| Report of Mediators | 3 (10.3) | |
| Report of Moderators | 3 (10.3) | |
| Intent-to-treat or present at follow-up | 14 (48.3) | |
| Imputation procedures | 5 (17.2) | |
| Quality of life measure | 8 (27.6) | |
| Measure of unintended consequences (negative) | 1 (3.4) | |
| Percent attrition at program completion | 24 (82.7) | |
| Cost effectiveness | 0 (0.0) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure efficacy/effectiveness | 8 (27.6) | |
| Adoption - Setting level | Number eligible and invited (exposed) sites | 9 (31.0) |
| Number of participating sites | 9 (31.0) | |
| Participation rate | 18 (62.1) | |
| Description of targeted location | 23 (79.3) | |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria of setting | 11 (37.9) | |
| Description of intervention location | 17 (58.6) | |
| Method to identify setting | 8 (27.6) | |
| Demographic comparisons between site and target site | 3 (10.3) | |
| Statistically significant comparisons between site and target site | 0 (0.0) | |
| Average number of persons served per setting | 4 (44.4) | |
| Adoption – Staff level | Number eligible and invited (exposed) staff | 0 (0.0) |
| Number participating in delivery | 9 (31.0) | |
| Participation rate of staff | 3 (10.3) | |
| Method to identify target delivery agent | 11 (37.9) | |
| Level of expertise of delivery agent | 16 (55.2) | |
| Inclusion/exclusion criteria of delivery agent | 5 (17.2) | |
| Demographic comparisons between staff and target staff | 1 (3.4) | |
| Statistically significant comparisons between site and target staff | 0 (0.0) | |
| Measures of cost of adoption | 3 (10.3) | |
| Dissemination beyond originally planned | 0 (0.0) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure adoption | 1 (3.4) | |
| Implementation | Theories | 21 (72.4) |
| Intervention number of contacts | 25 (86.2) | |
| Timing of contacts | 24 (82.8) | |
| Duration of contacts | 12 (41.4) | |
| Extent protocol delivered as intended | 5 (17.2) | |
| Consistency of implementation across setting and delivery agents | 5 (17.2) | |
| Participant attendance/completion rates | 13 (44.8) | |
| Measure of cost | 3 (10.3) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure implementation | 3 (10.3) | |
| Maintenance - Individual | Individual behavior assessed at some duration following the completion of the intervention | 4 (13.8) |
| Attrition at follow-up | 4 (13.8) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure individual maintenance | 0 (0.0) | |
| Maintenance - Organizational | Report alignment to organization mission | 1 (3.4) |
| Is the program still in place? | 0 (0.0) | |
| Was the program institutionalized? | 0 (0.0) | |
| Site attrition at follow-up | 0 (0.0) | |
| Use of qualitative methods to measure organizational level maintenance | 0 (0.0) |