Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 27;19:419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2401-3

Table 2.

Prevalence, cases, and ORs for postpartum depression assessed using EPDS according to education level

Highest education level p-value for trend
≥16 years
(n = 19,621)
>12–<16 years
(n = 38,030)
≤12 years
(n = 32,543)
1 month
 Prevalence, % 11.6 13.2 17.7
 Cases, n 2271 5010 5768
 OR (95% CI)
  Crude 1.00 1.16 (1.10–1.22) 1.65 (1.56–1.73) < .001
  Model 1 1.00 1.14 (1.08–1.20) 1.48 (1.40–1.56) < .001
  Model 2 1.00 1.07 (1.01–1.13) 1.26 (1.19–1.34) < .001
6 months
 Prevalence, % 9.0 10.5 15.2
 Cases, n 1768 3975 4933
 OR (95% CI)
  Crude 1.00 1.18 (1.11–1.25) 1.80 (1.70–1.92) < .001
  Model 1 1.00 1.15 (1.09–1.23) 1.57 (1.48–1.67) < .001
  Model 2 1.00 1.03 (0.97–1.10) 1.21 (1.13–1.29) < .001

The table shows the imputed data for the 90,194 mothers in the study

Boldface indicates statistical significance at the level of 5%

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

Cases: a total EPDS score of ≥9

Crude: crude model

Model 1: Partial model adjusted for physician-diagnosed history of depression, anxiety disorder, dysautonomia, and schizophrenia

Model 2: Full model adjusted for all the covariates of the model 1; maternal age; body mass index; parity; smoking status; alcohol intake; physical activity; employment status; feeding method; marital status; annual household income; and passive smoking status