Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 2;2019:8418760. doi: 10.1155/2019/8418760

Table 2.

Simulation results of metalogistic regression, meta-SVM, and the integrative deep learning (inclusion of 1 random study).

Methods σ Sensitivity (s.e) Specificity (s.e) Youden J index
Meta-SVM 0.1 0.8514 (0.008) 0.9531 (0.003) 0.8045
0.3 0.7804 (0.009) 0.8502 (0.005) 0.6345
0.5 0.8868 (0.007) 0.4567 (0.008) 0.3435
0.7 0.9930 (0.002) 0.0208 (0.002) 0.0138
0.9 0.8465 (0.012) 0.4899 (0.013) 0.3364

Metalogistic regression 0.1 0.1347 (0.007) 0.9392 (0.002) 0.0739
0.3 0.2131 (0.007) 0.9548 (0) 0.1680
0.5 0.2638 (0.01) 0.9338 (0.003) 0.1977
0.7 0.2555 (0.01) 0.8965 (0.004) 0.1520
0.9 0.2652 (0.01) 0.8706 (0.004) 0.1359

Integrative deep learning 0.1 0.7708 (0.024) 0.8345 (0.02) 0.6052
0.3 0.6812 (0.026) 0.7302 (0.023) 0.4114
0.5 0.6708 (0.022) 0.6989 (0.022) 0.3697
0.7 0.6979 (0.027) 0.6395 (0.029) 0.3375
0.9 0.7583 (0.028) 0.5828 (0.028) 0.3411