Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 2;2019:8418760. doi: 10.1155/2019/8418760

Table 3.

Simulation results of metalogistic regression, meta-SVM, and the integrative deep learning (inclusion of 2 random studies).

Methods σ Sensitivity (s.e) Specificity (s.e) Youden J index
Meta-SVM 0.1 0.8284 (0.008) 0.9815 (0.001) 0.8099
0.3 0.9090 (0.006) 0.1453 (0.005) 0.0543
0.5 0.9990 (0.001) 0.0010 (0.0003) 0
0.7 0.8518 (0.013) 0.2736 (0.012) 0.1254
0.9 0.9944 (0.0017) 0.0056 (0.001) 0

Metalogistic regression 0.1 0.1423 (0.008) 0.9062 (0.003) 0.0485
0.3 0.1861 (0.01) 0.9145 (0.003) 0.1006
0.5 0.2319 (0.01) 0.8678 (0.004) 0.0977
0.7 0.2527 (0.01) 0.8170 (0.006) 0.0697
0.9 0.2583 (0.01) 0.8359 (0.005) 0.0942

Integrative deep learning 0.1 0.7666 (0.018) 0.9135 (0.012) 0.6802
0.3 0.7562 (0.023) 0.7338 (0.02) 0.4901
0.5 0.7208 (0.022) 0.6968 (0.018) 0.4177
0.7 0.7187 (0.03) 0.6192 (0.029) 0.3380
0.9 0.7770 (0.02) 0.5229 (0.03) 0.3000