Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: Cognition. 2019 Dec 13;196:104152. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104152

Table 1.

Overview of Hypotheses

Sample Agents Hypotheses
Study 1
Adults Adults H1.1: Evaluations of eating/dressing/speaking reflect concerns with agents and others
H1.2: Concerns with agents and others constrain alterability of those evaluations
Study 2
Adults Adults H2.1: Most accept alternative rules that do not negatively impact agents and others
H2.2: Most reject alternative rules that negatively impact agents and others
H2.3: Justifications for why a rule was not okay reference effects on agents or others
Study 3
Adults Children H3.1: Most accept alternative rules that do not negatively impact agents and others
H3.2: Most reject alternative rules that negatively impact agents and others
H3.3: Justifications for why a rule was not okay reference effects on agents or others
Study 4
Adults Children H4.1: Most accept alternative rules that do not negatively impact agents and others
H4.2: Most reject alternative rules that negatively impact agents and others
H4.3: Justifications for why a rule was not okay reference effects on agents or others

Note. The table shows the hypotheses for each study. The leftmost column shows the participants used for each study and the next column shows the agents depicted in the situations presented to participants.