3.
Advantages and disadvantages of methods to diagnose pseudoprogression after immunotherapy
Methods to identify pseudoprogression | Type of tumor | Advantages | Disadvantages |
NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; IL-8, interleukin-8; US, ultrasonography. | |||
Biopsies of enlarged lesions or new lesions | Enlarged visible lesions that can be biopsied | Can provide the histopathology for the physician to judge the evolution of tumor and guide the clinical practice | Invasive procedure and may be refused by the patient. The biopsy tissue does not represent the whole lesion sometimes |
Radiographic follow-up | All kinds of tumors with measurable lesions | Convenient and noninvasive and can avoid a premature discontinued immunotherapy for pseudoprogression | Can accelerate progression if the patient experiences hyperprogression; can impede the use of effective treatments for those who are experiencing true progression |
SPION T2-weighted contrast MRI + PET-CT | Suitable for all kinds of tumors (theoretically) | Can distinguish inflammatory cell infiltration from the enlarged tumor tissue | Theoretical method; no clinical studies have been performed to prove its effectiveness |
US | Superficial or subcutaneous lesions | Convenient and economical, and can distinguish blood flow volume in the lesions | Reliability can differ depending on the operator |
Circulating tumor DNA | Melanoma | Consistent with tumor burden and reflects the dynamic change of the tumor | No current criteria for the diagnosis of pseudoprogression; high costs limit clinical use |
Serum IL-8 levels | Tumor cells of patients; positively correlate with tumor burden | Convenient and economical, the dynamic monitor of IL-8 can reflect the change in tumor burden | Theoretical methods; no published clinical studies prove the correlation between IL-8 and pseudoprogression |