. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 27.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2019 Sep 13;378:112237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112237

Table 2.

c-Fos (PC38)-ir/Tph-immunonegative cells

Rostrocaudal level (mm bregma)	Subregion¹	Sedentary (mean ± SEM)	Voluntary LAF (mean ± SEM)	Forced LAF (mean ± SEM)
−7.64	DRD	9.0 ± 1.7	4.8 ± 0.9	7.9 ± 2.0
	DRV	13.6 ± 2.6	8.1 ± 2.2	6.5 ± 1.7^*
	CLi	0.9 ± 0.2	0.6 ± 0.3	1.0 ± 0.4
−8.18	DRD	8.9 ± 4.3	10.1 ± 3.1	11.9 ± 2.9
	DRV	4.6 ± 1.7	4.3 ± 1.1	16.8 ± 4.0^**^##
	DRVL/VLPAG	25.1 ± 6.6	42.9 ± 10.5	42.9 ± 9.4
−8.54	DRC	1.7 ± 0.8	6.0 ± 2.2^*	3.9 ± 0.7
	DRI	9.5 ± 2.5	16.9 ± 5.7	22.4 ± 4.8^*

The subregions used for Experiment 2 included: DRC, dorsal raphe nucleus, caudal part; DRD, dorsal raphe nucleus, dorsal part; DRI, dorsal raphe nucleus, interfascicular part; DRV, dorsal raphe nucleus, ventral part; DRVL/VLPAG, dorsal raphe nucleus, ventrolateral part/ventrolateral periaqueductal gray.

p < 0.05

^**

p < 0.01, versus Sedentary group

^##

p < 0.01, Voluntary LAF exercise versus Forced LAF exercise,.