. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 27.

Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2019 Sep 13;378:112237. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112237

Table 3.

FosB/ΔFosB-ir/Tph-immunonegative neurons

Rostrocaudal level (mm bregma)	Subregion¹	Sedentary (mean ± SEM)	Voluntary LAF (mean ± SEM)	Forced LAF (mean ± SEM)
−7.64	DRD	5.3 ± 1.3	5.9 ± 1.8	7.3 ± 1.7
	DRV	1.6 ± 0.4	3.1 ± 1.1	1.6 ± 0.8
	CLi	0.0 ± 0.0	0.0 ± 0.0	0.3 ± 0.2
−8.18	DRD	3.4 ± 1.0	3.6 ± 1.0	7.3 ± 1.7 ^*^#
	DRV	1.4 ± 0.4	3.0 ± 0.9	7.6 ± 1.7^**^#
	DRVL/VLPAG	10.1 ± 2.0	12.6± 3.1	21.8 ± 2.6^**^#
−8.54	DRC	1.3 ± 0.5	2.7 ± 0.5	3.6 ± 1.1^*
	DRI	1.0 ± 0.3	7.1 ± 1.5^*	11.0 ± 2.3^***

The subregions used in Experiment 2 included: CLi, caudal linear nucleus; DRC, dorsal raphe nucleus, caudal part; DRD, dorsal raphe nucleus, dorsal part; DRI, dorsal raphe nucleus, interfascicular part; DRV, dorsal raphe nucleus, ventral part; DRVL/VLPAG, dorsal raphe nucleus, ventrolateral part/ventrolateral periaqueductal gray.

p < 0.05

^**

p < 0.01

^***

p < 0.001, versus Sedentary group

p < 0.05 Voluntary LAF exercise versus Forced LAF exercise.