Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 31;10(1):e2020011. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1001a11

Table 3.

Meta-analysis Results

Subgroup No. of Estimatesa No. of Lesions No. of Malignant Melanoma Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Specificity (%) (95% CI) sROC Area (95% CI)
All studies Naked eye 29 23,930 2,140 79 (72–85) 83 (76–88) 0.88 (0.85–0.91)
Dermoscopy 79 33,749 5,031 86 (83–89) 81 (76–86) 0.91 (0.88–0.93)
All studies Nonexperts 20 22,580 1,630 82 (73–89) 73 (60–83) 0.85 (0.82–0.88)
Experts 65 29,767 3,812 84 (79–87) 85 (80–89) 0.91 (0.88–0.93)
All studies Primary care 10 19,152 867 80 (65–89) 71 (52–85) 0.83 (0.79–0.86)
Secondary care 87 36,673 5,480 85 (82–88) 82 (77–87) 0.91 (0.88–0.93)
Nonexperts Naked eye 9 16,304 1,045 78 (60–90) 74 (54–88) 0.83 (0.80–0.86)
Dermoscopy 11 6,279 585 83 (76–89) 72 (55–84) 0.86 (0.83–0.89)
Experts Naked eye 16 7,115 922 79 (70–86) 86 (79–91) 0.90 (0.87–0.92)
Dermoscopy 49 22,652 2,890 85 (79–89) 85 (77–90) 0.91 (0.89–0.94)
Primary care Naked eye 6 14,822 595 78 (52–92) 74 (43–91) 0.83 (0.80–0.86)
Dermoscopy 4 4,330 272 82 (74–87) 66 (57–74) 0.83 (0.79–0.86)
Secondary care Naked eye 19 8,597 1,372 79 (71–86) 85 (78–90) 0.89 (0.86–0.91)
Dermoscopy 68 28,076 4,108 87 (83–90) 82 (75–87) 0.91 (0.88–0.93)
a

The number of estimates exceeds the number of studies because multiple estimates are made using dermoscopy with alternative diagnostic algorithms.

CI = confidence interval; sROC = summary receiver operating characteristic.