Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):168–179. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180236

Table 1.

Characteristics of Pair-Matched Practices, Based on Clinician Survey Responses

Pair Match Practice Type 2013 Locale Population Panel Size Pts/Day % Medicare Reg Use of AD Form % Discuss AD
1 FQHC 17,140 >2000 12 25 to 49 N 0
1 Independent 6,027 >3000 >40 50 to 74 N 1 to 24
2 Residency/Corporate 610,613 >3000 30 to 39 25 to 49 N × 2, Y × 1 1 to 24
2 Residency 610,613 >3000 40 25 to 74 Y × 1, N × 4 1 to 24
3 Independent 23,400 >3000 10 to 19 25 to 49 N 0
3 Independent 17,140 >3000 20 to 29 50 to 74 N 1 to 24

2013 Locale Population, based on 2013 data; % Discuss AD: Estimated percent of patients with whom the clinician believes they discuss ADs at baseline; FQHC, Federally Qualified Health Center; pts/day, estimated average number of patients seen per day; % Medicare, estimated percent Medicare-insured patients; Reg Use of AD Form, Does the clinician use an AD form on a regular basis? (Y, yes; N, no, ×# indicates how many clinicians gave this answer).

AD, Advance Directive.