. 2019 Dec 30;9:20344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56671-w

Table 8.

Correlation coefficient^a between pairs of glucosinolates and antioxidant capacities in Chinese kale.

Trait	GIB^b	PRO	SIN	GRA	GNA	GER	GBS	4-OMGBS	NGBS	GST	TALG	TIG	TARG	TG	AC
GIB		0.290**^c	0.794**	0.543**	0.322**	−0.076**	0.653**		0.119**		0.391**	0.592**		0.343**
		0.307**	0.831**	0.546**	0.336**	−0.083**	0.674**		0.119**		0.406**	0.612**		0.354**
PRO	0.729**		0.456**	0.439**	0.739**	0.586**	0.174**	0.519**	0.720**	0.503**	0.840**	0.528**	0.503**	0.844**	−0.196**
			0.460**	0.442**	0.735**	0.588**	0.176**	0.525**	0.728**	0.509**	0.840**	0.536**	0.509**	0.847**	−0.217**
SIN	1.000**	0.817**		0.351**	0.560**		0.422**	0.151**	0.074**	0.112**	0.611**	0.425**	0.112**	0.517**	0.097**
				0.363**	0.562**		0.422**	0.145**	0.072**	0.110**	0.614**	0.425**	0.110**	0.517**	0.097**
GRA	1.000**	0.727**	1.000**		0.687**		0.728**		0.482**	−0.071**	0.661**	0.754**	−0.071**	0.522**
					0.696**		0.749**		0.486**	−0.074**	0.668**	0.775**	−0.074**	0.527**
GNA	1.000**	0.874**	1.000**	1.000**		0.222**	0.39**	0.204**	0.542**	0.174**	0.961**	0.570**	0.174**	0.797**
						0.215**	0.393**	0.198**	0.542**	0.170**	0.96**	0.574**	0.170**	0.795**
GER		0.763**	0.106**		0.255**		−0.172**	0.847**	0.688**	0.887**	0.438**	0.283**	0.887**	0.696**	−0.496**
							−0.179**	0.852**	0.692**	0.891**	0.434**	0.281**	0.891**	0.695**	−0.512**
GBS	0.958**	0.519**	0.981**	0.929**	0.924**	−0.223**		−0.15**	0.208**	−0.169**	0.373**	0.849**	−0.169**	0.301**	0.23**
								−0.165**	0.200**	−0.174**	0.375**	0.847**	−0.174**	0.298**	0.226**
4-OMGBS		0.767**	0.112**		0.247**	1.000**	−0.261**		0.692**	0.952**	0.400**	0.339**	0.952**	0.704**	−0.556**
									0.693**	0.957**	0.398**	0.330**	0.957**	0.705**	−0.580**
NGBS	0.489**	0.974**	0.582**	0.402**	0.611**	0.965**	0.127*	0.965**		0.635**	0.652**	0.670**	0.635**	0.791**	−0.377**
										0.642**	0.654**	0.667**	0.642**	0.795**	−0.402**
GST		0.754**			0.217**	1.000**	−0.232**	0.988**	0.940**		0.378**	0.297**	1.000**	0.703**	−0.481**
											0.376**	0.298**	1.000**	0.704**	−0.496**
TALG	0.938**	0.978**	0.974**	0.899**	0.972**	0.482**	0.765**	0.483**	0.803**	0.455**		0.636**	0.378**	0.914**
												0.641**	0.376**	0.913**
TIG	0.956**	0.970**	1.000**	0.899**	1.000**	0.438**	0.786**	0.402**	0.717**	0.411**	1.000**		0.297**	0.689**
													0.298**	0.691**	−0.075*
TARG		0.754**			0.217**	1.000**	−0.232**	0.988**	0.940**	1.000**	0.455**	0.411**		0.703**	−0.481**
														0.704**	−0.496**
TG	0.697**	1.000**	0.770**	0.661**	0.825**	0.764**	0.487**	0.748**	0.970**	0.736**	0.938**	0.939**	0.736**		−0.248**
															−0.266**
AC	0.164**	−0.289**	0.178**	0.231**	0.140**	−0.651**	0.632**	−0.744**	−0.591**	−0.631**		0.093*	−0.631**	−0.277**

^aThe phenotypic correlation coefficient (r_P) and genotypic correlation coefficient (r_G) were in the upper and lower line in the upper right corner of the table, respectively. The organ correlation coefficient (r_O) was in the lower left corner of the table.

^bThe abbreviations in table were shown in Table 1.

^c* and ** indicate significance at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.