Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 30;19:269. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-1039-8

Table 3.

ANCOVA analysing the performance of Wingate anaerobic and incremental knee-extension tests during MRI spectroscopy adjusting for qCSA and height

df Significancy (p) partial Eta-squared
Wingate test peak power (W)
 Model 3 < 0.000 .704
 CF/non-CF 1 0.230 .125
 Cross-sectional area M. quadriceps (cm3) 1 < 0.000 .301
 Height (cm) 1 0.005 .188
Wingate test mean power (W)
 Model 3 < 0.000 .800
 CF/non-CF 1 0.900 .072
 Cross-sectional area M. quadriceps (cm3) 1 < 0.000 .510
 Height (cm) 1 0.001 .246
Wingate test power drop (%)
 Model 3 0.001 .361
 CF/non-CF 1 0.230 .037
 Cross-sectional area M. quadriceps (cm3) 1 0.027 .119
 Height (cm) 1 0.252 .034
Maximal work load during incremental test in MRI (kg)
 Model 3 < 0.000 .600
 CF/non-CF 1 0.078 .002
 Cross-sectional area M. quadriceps (cm3) 1 < 0.005 .183
 Height 1 0.001 .247

Results of general linear models with Wingate test performance and maximal work load during MRI spectroscopy as dependent variable and disease status, height and cross sectional area of M. quadriceps as independent variables in the total cohort (n = 43). Effects of the respective factors on the model are presented as partial eta squared