Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 30;19:529. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2689-5

Table 5.

Effect estimates and certainty of evidence for clinical interventions that influence uterine dehiscence rates

Comparison No. of studies Comparison 1 (no. of women with uterine dehiscence/no. of women) Comparison 2 (no. of women with uterine dehiscence/no. of women) Risk Difference, M-H, Random (95% CI) I2 (%) Quality
Pharmacologic induction
 PGE1 vs. spontaneous labor Prospective cohort (2) 5/117 6/357 0.02 (−0.06, 0.09) 65 Very Low
 PGE2 vs. spontaneous labor Prospective cohort (2) 1/171 0/222 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) 0 Very Low
 Oxytocin vs. spontaneous labor

Prospective cohort (3)

Retrospective cohort (2)

21/1113 16/2298 0.01 (0.00, 0.02) 20 Very Low
 Mifepristone vs. placebo RCT (1) 1/16 1/16 0.00 (− 0.17, 0.17) NA Low
 Epidural analgesia vs. no epidural Retrospective cohort (1) 4/87 1/150 0.04 (− 0.01, 0.09) NA Very Low
 Oxytocin vs. PGE2 Prospective cohort (1) 1/208 1/146 0.00 (−0.02, 0.01) NA Very Low
 Active inpatient management (+/− oxytocin) vs. expectant outpatient management (+/− oxytocin) RCT (1) 5/95 0/93 0.05 (0.00, 0.10) NA Very Low
Non-pharmacologic induction
 Membrane sweep vs. spontaneous labor RCT (1) 0/62 1/61 -0.02 (− 0.06, 0.03) NA Very Low
 30 mL Foley catheter vs. 80 mL Foley catheter RCT (1) 2/77 7/77 −0.06 (− 0.14, 0.01) NA Low
Pharmacologic vs. Non-pharmacologic or Combined (pharmacologic + non-pharmacologic)
 Oxytocin +/− amniotomy vs. amniotomy Retrospective cohort (1) 4/102 0/35 0.04 (− 0.02, 0.09) NA Very Low
 Induction (PGE2, oxytocin, amniotomy and/or Foley catheter) vs. spontaneous labor Retrospective cohort (1) 13/1576 36/4263 0.00 (− 0.01, 0.01) NA Very Low
 Induction (oxytocin, PGE2, misoprostol + oxytocin [augmentation]) vs. spontaneous labor Retrospective cohort (1) 4/57 3/179 0.05 (−0.02, 0.12) NA Very Low

CI confidence interval, NA not applicable, NS not specified, no. number, PGE1/PGE2 prostaglandin 1/prostaglandin 2; RCT randomized clinical trial, VD vaginal delivery, vs. versus