Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 19;381(12):1114–1123. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815359

Table 2:

Primary and secondary end points, by study arm

Polypill Usual Care Difference (95%, CI)* P
Baseline 12 months Baseline 12 months
Primary End Points
Systolic BP, mmHg 140 (19) 131 (21) 140 (17) 138 (23) −7 (−12, −2) 0.003
LDL cholesterol, mg/dl 113 (33) 98 (35) 113 (37) 109 (32) −11 (−18, −5) 0.0003
Secondary End Points
Diastolic BP, mmHg 83 (8) 78 (9) 83 (8) 81 (10) −3 (−5, −1) -
TC, mg/dl 198 (37) 183 (47) 199 (42) 194 (37) −11 (−19, −3) -
HDL cholesterol, mg/dl 62 (21) 60 (21) 64 (23) 63 (21) −1 (−4, 2) -
TG, mg/dl 116 (88) 118 (104) 110 (76) 115 (71) −2 (−20, 15) -
CVD risk estimate 12.0 (8.8) 9.4 (8.0) 12.8 (9.9) 13.3 (11.5) −3.1 (−4.6, −1.6) -

Values shown are mean (SD). BP, blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; CVD, cardiovascular disease. Sample size for systolic blood pressure (at both baseline and 12 months): polypill arm (n=128), usual care (n=147). Sample size for LDL cholesterol (at both baseline and 12 months): polypill arm (n=126), usual care (n=147). Twenty participants in the polypill arm and 8 participants in the usual care arm discontinued trial participation and did not have data at 12 months. In addition, two participants in the polypill arm had missing LDL data, due to insufficient blood sample (n=1) or missing baseline direct LDL cholesterol measurement (n=1). One TG observation was censored due to value > 1000.

*

95% confidence intervals presented in this report have not been adjusted for multiplicity, and therefore inferences drawn from these intervals may not be reproducible.