Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 31;20:3. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1134-6

Table 1.

Positive predictive value of serrated polyps in Swedish histopathology reports

Variable SNOMED codes M8213(0)/M8216(0) Free text “serrated” Total
Individuals 52 (49%) 76 (72%) 106 (100%)
By subtype
Hyperplastic polyp 5 (10%) 31 (41%) 34 (32%)
Traditional serrated adenoma 2 (4%) 3 (4%) 3 (3%)
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp 49 (94%) 40 (53%) 70 (66%)
Unspecified serrated polyp 0 (0%) 3 (4%) 3 (3%)
False positive serrated polyp 0 (0%) 5 (7%) 5 (5%)
PPV, SP diagnosis 52/52, 100% (95%CI = 93–100%) 71/76, 93% (95%CI = 86–97%) 101/106, 95% (95%CI = 89–98%)
By year of diagnosis
  < 2000 0/0 17/19, 89% 17/19, 89%
2000–2009 16/16, 100% 10/11, 91% 25/26, 96%
  ≥ 2010 36/36, 100% 44/46, 96% 59/61, 97%
PPV, location 49/52, 94% (95%CI = 84–98%)
By topography code
T67 25/25, 100%
T671 1/1, 100%
T672 3/3, 100%
T677 2/2, 100%
T68 18/21, 86%
PPV, SSA/P diagnosis 49/52, 94% (95%CI = 84–98%)

Abbreviations: CI = Confidence interval; PPV = Positive predictive value; SP = Serrated polyp; SNOMED = Systematised Nomenclature of Medicine