Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec;16(12):847–854. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.12.001

Table 2. Adjusted OR (95% CI) of HRD and PRD by history of depression status for participants from the CLSA Comprehensive Cohort at baseline.

Model 1 (n = 29,061)
Model 2 (n = 25,197)
Model 3 (n = 22,774)
OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value OR 95% CI P-value
HRD
Group 1 1.00 1.00 1.00
Group 2 1.39 1.23–1.58 < 0.0001 1.21 1.05–1.39 0.01 1.12 0.95–1.31 NS
Group 3 1.55 1.37–1.76 < 0.0001 1.44 1.25–1.64 < 0.0001 1.36 1.18–1.58 < 0.0001
Group 4 2.01 1.71–2.36 < 0.0001 1.53 1.28–1.83 < 0.0001 1.31 1.08–1.61 < 0.01
PRD
Group 1 1.00 1.00 1.00
Group 2 1.30 1.19–1.41 < 0.0001 1.15 1.04–1.27 < 0.005 1.07 0.96–1.18 NS
Group 3 1.46 1.34–1.58 < 0.0001 1.29 1.18–1.41 < 0.0001 1.20 1.09–1.32 < 0.0005
Group 4 1.88 1.69–2.09 < 0.0001 1.36 1.20–1.54 < 0.0001 1.17 1.02–1.34 < 0.03

CI: confidence interval; CLSA: Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging; HRD: heart related disorders; NS: non-statistical significance; OR: odds ratio; PRD: peripheral/vascular related disorders. Group 1: CES-D10 score < 10 and negative clinical depression history; Group 2: CES-D10 score ≥ 10 and negative clinical depression history; Group 3: CES-D10 score < 10 and positive clinical depression history; Group 4: CES-D10 score ≥ 10 and positive clinical depression history. Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity; Model 2: further adjusted for body mass index, marital status, education, income, immigrant status, number of close friends, and life style factors (alcohol, smoking, and physical activity); Model 3: further adjusted for comorbidities.