Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;11(1):113–119. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13244

Table 2.

Patient characteristics of the study population in the sensitivity analysis

IGRT (n = 295) non‐IGRT (n = 295)
Number or mean (sd) (%) Number or mean (sd) (%) SDif
Age < 65 219 (74) 223 (76) 0.031
≥ 65 76 (26) 72 (24)
Gender Female 13 (4) 9 (3) 0.072
Male 282 (96) 286 (97)
Residency Non‐north 212 (72) 209 (71) 0.022
North 83 (28) 86 (29)
Comorbidity Without 178 (60) 178 (60) 0
With 117 (40) 117 (40)
T‐stage T1‐T2 49 (17) 47 (16) 0.018
T3‐T4 246 (83) 248 (84)
N‐stage Negative 19 (6) 16 (5) 0.043
Positive 276 (94) 279 (95)
RT delivery 3DCRT § § § § 0
IMRT § § § §
Use of PET No 69 (23) 63 (21) 0.049
Yes 226 (77) 232 (79)
Drinking No 41 (14) 37 (13) 0.040
Yes 254 (86) 258 (87)
Betel nut chewing No 149 (51) 147 (50) 0.014
Yes 146 (49) 148 (50)
Smoking No 43 (15) 41 (14) 0.019
Yes 252 (85) 254 (86)
BMI 22.00 (3.37) 21.97 (3.69) 0.007
Peri‐CCRT systemic therapy Without 206 (70) 207 (70) 0.007
With 89 (30) 88 (30)
RT break ≤1 week 205 (69) 209 (71) 0.030
>1 week 90 (31) 86 (29)
RT dose (Gy) 57.75 (6.67) 57.91 (6.54) 0.024

Rounded.

Carlson comorbidity score ≥ 1.

§

The exact numbers were not reported because of a Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC) database center policy to avoid numbers in single cells (≤2).

3DCRT, 3D conformal radiotherapy; BMI, body mass index; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; IGRT, image‐guided radiotherapy; IMRT, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy; PET, positron emission tomography; RT, radiotherapy; sd, standard deviation; SDif, standardized difference.