Table 2.
Imputed univariable and multivariable regression analysis of turnover predictors in care homes
| Care home staff % turnover | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| n | Model 1: coef (95% CI) | Model 2: coef (95% CI) | |
| Staff-related factors | |||
| Mean staff emotional exhaustion | 97 | −0.34 (−1.74, 1.07) | −0.84 (−2.85, 1.17) |
| Mean staff depersonalisation | 97 | −0.13 (−4.15, 4.41) | 1.50 (−4.01, 7.01) |
| Mean staff personal accomplishment | 97 | 0.11 (−2.11, 2.32) | 0.24 (−2.20, 2.68) |
| Staff sex: % male staff | 97 | 0.09 (−0.40, 0.57) | −0.03 (−0.62 0.55) |
| Staff age | 97 | −0.78 (−1.79; 0.24) | −0.99 (−2.11, 0.13) |
| % staff that speak English as second language | 97 | −0.04 (−0.23, 0.15) | −0.03 (−0.24, 0.19) |
| Shiftwork: % staff that do night shifts | 97 | −0.08 (−0.34, 0.18) | −0.09 (−0.37, 0.18) |
| Resident-related factors | |||
| Agitation (CMAI total) | 97 | −0.25 (−0.87, 0.36) | – |
| Care home-related factors | |||
| CQC rating standards of staffing | |||
| All standards met | 97 | Ref. | |
| Not all standards met | −12.31 (−43.71, 19.08) | – | |
| CQC rating standards of management | |||
| All standards met | 97 | Ref. | |
| Not all standards met | −4.31 (−42.21, 33.58) | – | |
| Type of care home | |||
| Nursing | 97 | Ref. | Ref. |
| Personal | −13.73 (−27.48, 0.03) | −16.18 (−31.90, −0.46)* | |
| Average CH TESS score | 97 | −1.47 (−2.96, 0.02) | – |
Model 1 = univariable linear regression; Model 2 = multivariable linear regression; Ref. = reference group; – = not included in multivariate analysis and CH: care home.
* P < 0.05.
** P < 0.001.