Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Aug;28(3):707–720. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416000262

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of the indirect effect using the distribution of product method to test the mediation effect of coercive relationship talk. The dot represents the point estimate (μ) of the average indirect effect of coercive relationship talk, and the horizontal bar shows the 95% confidence interval. Given that the 95% confidence interval is greater than zero, support was found for the significant mediating effect of coercive relationship talk. LL, Lower limit of the confidence interval; UL, upper limit of the confidence interval; σ, standard deviation of the product distribution.