Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;16(1):48–54. doi: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4969

Table 3.

Association between the scores from the sexual quality of life and dyadic adjustment scales in the groups (N=176)

Mastectomy group (n=88) Control group (n=88)


SQL DA S CH CN SQL DA S CH CN
Dyadic Adjustment (DA) 0.457 0.500
 Satisfaction (S) 0.267* 0.867 0.414 0.837
 Cohesion (CH) 0.383 0.813 0.620 0.388 0.799 0.544
 Consensus (CN) 0.476 0.928 0.681 0.658 0.433 0.959 0.698 0.717
 Affectional expression (AE) 0.538 0.861 0.681 0.717 0.771 0.625 0.798 0.596 0.542 0.758

SQL: Sexual Quality of Life; DA: Dyadic Adjustment; S: Satisfaction; CH: Cohesion; CN: Consensus; AE: Affectional expression

*

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)