Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Spine Deform. 2019 Nov;7(6):890–898.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2019.01.011

Table 1.

Summary Baseline and Outcome Characteristics of the BrAIST, External Validation and Combined Samples

Characteristics BrAIST
(n=115)
External
Validation
(n=152)
p-
value*
Combined
(n=267)
Age (mean ± SD (range)) 12.5±1.2 (10-15) 12.6±1.3 (9-16) 0.35 12.57±1.2 (9-16)
Sex – Female (n, %) 100 (87) 123 (81) 0.24 223 (84)
Curve Classification (n, %)
Thoracic 25 (22) 45 (30) 0.10 70 (26)
Thoracolumbar or Lumbar 18 (16) 35 (23) 53 (20)
Thoracic with Thoracolumbar or Lumbar 54 (47) 55 (36) 109 (41)
Double Thoracic 9 (8) 12 (8) 21 (8)
Triple 9 (8) 5 (3) 14 (5)
Thoracic Apex (1 or more) 97 (84) 117 (77) 0.16 214 (80)
Maximum Cobb Angle (mean±SD (range)) 29.6±6.5 (18-47) 26.6±8.3 (11-44) <0.01 27.9±7.7 (11-47)
Risser Grade (n, %)
0 77 (67) 84 (55) 0.02 161 (60)
1 22 (19) 29 (19) 51 (19)
2 13 (11) 19 (13) 32 (12)
3+ 3 (3) 20 (13) 23 (9)
Maturity Stage# (SMS) (n, %)
1 1 (1) 0 <0.02 1 (1)
2 40 (35) 31 (20) 71 (27)
3 32 (28) 46 (30) 78 (29)
4 17 (15) 44 (29) 61 (23)
5 9 (8) 5 (3) 14 (5)
6 15 (13) 24 (16) 39 (15)
7 1 (1) 2 (1) 3 (1)
Triradiate# – Open (n, %) 30 (28) 8 (22) 0.52 38 (26)
Poor Prognosis^ (n, %) 60 (52) 56 (37) 0.01 116 (43)

SD, standard deviation; SMS, skeletal maturity stage

^

Poor Prognosis was defined as a Cobb angle ≥45° prior to reaching Risser 4

#

status of the triradiate was not available for 7 subjects in the BrAIST cohort and for 115 of the subjects in the External validation cohort

*

Fisher’s exact test or t-test for differences between BrAIST and Validation sample