Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov;11(11):4875–4885. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.45

Table 3. Selected references regarding surgical technique and operative outcomes in infective endocarditis.

Author Year Design, use of database, study period, valve evaluated Patient and operative profile Method of reconstruction Outcome Comment
Savage et al. (33) 2014 Retrospective, STS ACSD, 2005–2011, primary (n=8,421) and re-operative (n=3,139) cases of IE involving the aortic valve undergoing mechanical vs. stented biologic vs. homografts Biologic patients were older with more DM, HLD, HTN, Class III/IV HF Valve replacement, vs. root replacement with valve conduit vs. other (repair, root without valve etc.) Adjusted mortality higher in root replacement compared to valve replacement (OR 1.43). Homografts worse mortality compared to biologic (OR 1.37). Unadjusted mortality for primary vs. re-operative: 9.8 vs. 21.1% Use of biologic increasing over time across all cases, with mechanical and homograft decreasing in both primary and re-operative cases. Homografts used mostly in re-operations
Mayer et al. (36) 2011 Retrospective, single institution, 2000–2009, 100 cases of aortic IE 31 cases in ICU preoperatively. Replacement patients older with significantly higher EuroSCORE. CBP and cross-clamp time similar Repair (33%) vs. replacement (67%) (biologic, mechanical, Ross) Early mortality and morbidity similar (9% vs. 18%, P=0.37). Survival at 4 years better after repair (44% vs. 65% P=0.047). Re-operation more frequent after repair (only in >1 cm patches) AR more frequent in repair than replacement (P=0.066)
Kim et al. (37) 2016 Retrospective propensity-matched, 2 tertiary referral institutions, 2002–2014, 304 adults with active IE Xenograft patients oldest followed by homograft and mechanical. DM, smoking and class III/IV HF similar Homograft (28.3%) vs. mechanical (26%) vs. xenograft (45.7%) After risk adjustment, early (19.8% vs. 12.7% vs. 7.2%) & long-term mortality (26.7%vs. 19.0% vs. 15.8%) or valve-related complications similar. Homograft did not affect reinfection rate Risk factor for early & late mortality: IDDM, elevated Cr, MRSA, multivalve IE, PVE, IABP, and root replacement. Risk factor for reinfection: current IVDU, multivalve IE, severe valvular dysfunction. Homograft not associated with reinfection
Lee et al. (38) 2018 Retrospective, Taiwanese national research database, 2000–2013, 1,999 cases of MV surgery for IE. 352 propensity-matched patients in the final analysis Repair vs. replacement had similar baseline characteristics MV replacement (78.8%) vs. repair (21.2%) Repair had lower in-hospital mortality (6.3% vs. 10.8%. P=0.031), lower late mortality (HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.52–0.7), fewer strokes, transfusions The beneficial effect of repair was less apparent in hospitals with low volume. Among patients with active IE, MV repair had lower all-cause mortality

STS, society of thoracic surgeons; ACDS, adult cardiac surgery database; IE, infective endocarditis; DM, diabetes mellitus; HLD, hyperlipidemia; HTN, hypertension; HF, heart failure; OR, odds ratio; CBP, cardio-pulmonary bypass; NVE, native valve endocarditis; PVE, prosthetic valve endocarditis; IDDM, insulin-dependent DM; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; MV, mitral valve.