Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;7(12):e15045. doi: 10.2196/15045

Table 3.

Responsiveness of Fitbit Charge 2 and Mio Slice.

Group and activity Oxycon Mobile, Mean difference (kcala) P value Fitbit Charge 2, Mean difference (kcal) P value Mio Slice, Mean difference (kcal) P value
CADb (N=18)

Cycling


0 versus 40 watts 2.7 <.001 3.3 .003 3.2 <.001
0 versus 70 watts 5.4 <.001 2.6 .11 5.1 <.001
40 versus 70 watts 2.7 <.001 0.7 .67 1.9 .03
Walking

4 km/h versus 4 km/h 5% slope 2.5 <.001 1.8 .15 2.2 .36
4 km/h versus 5.5 km/h 2.5 <.001 2.6 .15 3.8 .31
4 km/h 5% slope versus 5.5 km/h 0.1 .71 4.4 .01 1.6 .42
HFrEFc (N=18)

Cycling


0 versus 25 watts 1.2 <.001 0.3 .88 1.1 .23
0 versus 50 watts 3.0 <.001 1.0 .46 4.7 .02
25 versus 50 watts 1.9 <.001 1.3 .40 3.6 .02
Walking

3 km/h versus 3 km/h 5% slope 1.1 .002 1.9 .16 .8 .66
3 km/h versus 4.5 km/h 1.5 .001 .3 .89 2.2 .16
3 km/h 5% slope versus 4.5 km/h 0.4 .27 2.2 .08 3.0 .03

akcal: kilocalories.

bCAD: coronary artery disease.

cHFrEF: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.