Table 2.
Study quality ratings for quasi-experimental study.
| Items | Studies reviewed | ||||||
| de Jong, 2016 [14] | Delbanco et al, 2012 [34] | Greenwood et al, 2014 [16] | Lee et al, 2017 [18] | Milani et al, 2017 [19] | Toscos et al, 2016 [21] | Weisner et al, 2016 [22] | |
| Is it clear in the study what is the cause, and what is the effect? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Was there a control group? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre- and postintervention/exposure? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Was follow-up complete and, if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow-up adequately described and analyzed? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |