Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;219(3):400–409. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy542

Table 3.

Dose-Response Between Cigarette Smoking and Oral Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Levels Among Healthy Subjects in China

Variable Current Smoker Former Smoker
Low/High EBV Loadsa Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P Low/High EBV Loadsa Adjusted OR (95% CI)b P
Age at smoking initiation, y
 Never 1930/1429 1.00 (reference) 1930/1429 1.00 (reference)
 ≥20 548/847 1.71 (1.48–1.98) <.001 168/165 1.02 (.80–1.31) .834
 <20 472/682 1.68 (1.43–1.97) <.001 145/140 1.04 (.80–1.34) .763
P trend c <.001 .736
Daily smoking amount, packs
 Never 1930/1429 1.00 (reference) 1930/1429 1.00 (reference)
 <1 447/573 1.46 (1.25–1.72) <.001 141/109 0.84 (.64–1.10) .203
 ≥1 569/957 1.91 (1.64–2.21) <.001 137/169 1.28 (1.00–1.65) .054
P trend c <.001 .169
Smoking duration, y
 Never 1930/1429 1.00 (reference) 1930/1429 1.00 (reference)
 ≤25 532/682 1.61 (1.37–1.88) <.001 174/171 1.10 (.87–1.40) .414
 >25 486/851 1.80 (1.54–2.11) <.001 105/108 0.98 (.73–1.32) .886
P trend c <.001 .811
Cumulative amount smoked, pack-years
 Never 1930/1429 1.00 (reference) 1930/1429 1.00 (reference)
 <20 538/685 1.53 (1.32–1.79) <.001 166/153 1.02 (.80–1.30) .888
 ≥20 479/845 1.89 (1.62–2.21) <.001 112/125 1.11 (.84–1.48) .455
P trend c <.001 .486
Smoking type, inhaled or not inhaled
 Never 1930/1429 1.00 (reference) 1930/1429 1.00 (reference)
 Did not inhale 405/533 1.49 (1.26–1.75) <.001 136/110 0.89 (.67–1.17) .397
 Inhaled 597/973 1.85 (1.60–2.14) <.001 167/179 1.11 (.88–1.42) .378
P trend c <.001 0.554 .554

aOral EBV levels were divided into low and high levels according to the median number of EBV copies in saliva or mouthwash, per milliliter. For mouthwash EBV loads in the 21RCCP population, a low EBV level refers to <104.55 copies/mL of mouthwash and a high EBV level refers to ≥104.55 copies/mL of mouthwash; for salivary EBV loads in the south, north, and northeast populations, a low EBV level refers to <104.47 copies/mL of saliva, and a high EBV level refers to ≥104.47 copies/mL of saliva.

bLogistic regression analyses were used to assess odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by adjusting for age (continuous variable), sex (male or female), education level (high school and less or university and greater), and alcohol consumption (nondrinker, ≤1 drink/day, or >1 drink/day).

cLinear trends tests were performed by treating ordered categorical variables as continuous variables.