Table 1.
Statistical analysis of RMLFP power spectral data presented in Figure 2 and similar analyses for LPEEG data
| Behavioral state | Factor(s) | DF | F value | P | LPEEG p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waking | Frequency | 38, 266 | 16.33 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Condition | 1, 7 | 0.05 | 0.82 | 0.68 | |
| Time | 1, 7 | 0.25 | 0.64 | 0.35 | |
| Frequency x Condition | 38, 266 | 0.42 | 0.99 | 0.90 | |
| Frequency x Time | 38, 266 | 2.03 | 0.001 | 0.000 | |
| Condition x Time | 1, 7 | 3.41 | 0.11 | 0.73 | |
| Frequency x Condition x Time | 38, 266 | 2.27 | 0.000 | 0.94 | |
| NREM | Frequency | 38, 266 | 22.93 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Condition | 1, 7 | 2.06 | 0.20 | 0.51 | |
| Time | 1, 7 | 15.61 | 0.006 | 0.03 | |
| Frequency x Condition | 38, 266 | 2.03 | 0.001 | 0.98 | |
| Frequency x Time | 38, 266 | 16.28 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Condition x Time | 1, 7 | 2.23 | 0.18 | 0.14 | |
| Frequency x Condition x Time | 38, 266 | 2.84 | 0.000 | 0.26 | |
| REM | Frequency | 38, 266 | 8.58 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Condition | 1, 7 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 0.50 | |
| Time | 1, 7 | 3.91 | 0.09 | 0.26 | |
| Frequency x Condition | 38, 266 | 1.38 | 0.08 | 0.94 | |
| Frequency x Time | 38, 266 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.000 | |
| Condition x Time | 1, 7 | 0.13 | 0.73 | 0.24 | |
| Frequency x Condition x Time | 38, 266 | 0.47 | 0.99 | 0.64 |
Results from a three-way, repeated measures, ANOVA comparing effects of frequency (between 0.5 and 20 Hz with 0.5 Hz bins), condition (saline vs. ZIP), and time (early vs. late light period) on local field potential power at the site of injection. Significant p values are bolded with trends in presented in grey. p Values obtained from identical analyses performed on LPEEG data are presented in the final column.