Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;42(5):zsz028. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsz028

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of individual slow-wave data presented in Figure 4

Recording site Slow-wave characteristic Factor(s) DF F value P
Motor cortex Amplitude Sleep Pressure 2, 14 45.28 0.000
Condition 1, 7 7.65 0.03
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 14 0.86 0.45
Ascending slope Sleep Pressure 2, 14 42.87 0.000
Condition 1, 7 9.78 0.02
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 14 0.82 0.46
Descending slope Sleep Pressure 2, 14 43.29 0.000
Condition 1, 7 9.95 0.02
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 14 1.01 0.39
Multipeak wave incidence Sleep Pressure 2, 14 25.00 0.000
Condition 1, 7 1.94 0.21
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 14 1.67 0.22
Parietal cortex Amplitude Sleep Pressure 2, 12 35.09 0.000
Condition 1, 6 0.004 0.95
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 12 1.51 0.26
Ascending slope Sleep Pressure 2, 12 32.29 0.000
Condition 1, 6 0.03 0.86
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 12 1.20 0.34
Descending slope Sleep Pressure 2, 12 28.97 0.000
Condition 1, 6 0.01 0.91
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 12 1.45 0.27
Multipeak wave incidence Sleep Pressure 2, 12 15.17 0.001
Condition 1, 6 0.94 0.37
Sleep Pressure x Condition 2, 12 0.92 0.43

Results from two-way repeated measures ANOVAs comparing effects of global sleep pressure (high, medium, and low) and condition (saline vs. ZIP) on characteristics of individual slow waves at the injection site. Significant p values are bolded.