Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2019 Nov 8;55:101374. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101374

Table 3:

Mean particle size, polydispersity index, mean, entrapment efficiency (%EE) and loading efficiency (% LE) of Poloxamer 188

Formulation Mean Particle size (nm) Polydispersity index Mean Zeta Potential (mV) % Entrapment Efficiency (% EE) % Loading Efficiency (% LE)
Gem-SLN1 565 ± 66 0.197 ± 0.03 −27.1 ± 0.5 16.5 ± 0.1 0.77
Gem-SLN2 676 ± 69 0.134 ± 0.01 −25.1 ± 1.3 43.5 ± 2.2 0.86
Gem-SLN3 584 ± 16 0.352 ± 0.12 −23.6 ± 0.2 20.0 ± 1.0 0.69
Gem-SLN4 684 ± 49 0.146 ± 0.03 −22.1 ± 0.9 56.6 ± 5.4 0.84
Gem-SLN5 264 ± 2 0.204 ± 0.02 −29.9 ± 0.9 ND NA
Gem-SLN6 279 ± 8 0.192 ± 0.01 −33.3 ± 0.4 47.0 ± 3.6 0.85
Gem-SLN7 228 ± 5 0.109 ±0.01 −31.4 ± 0.7 ND NA
Gem-SLN8 334 ± 6 0.191 ± 0.01 −29.1 ± 0.3 ND NA
Gem-SLN9 545 ± 20 0.395 ± 0.07 −24.9 ± 0.2 ND NA
Gem-SLN10 470 ± 3 0.218 ± 0.04 −25.0 ± 1.4 53.2 ± 2.8 0.86
Gem-SLN11 518 ± 22 0.252 ± 0.01 −22.4 ± 0.4 51.1 ± 2.2 0.82
Gem-SLN12 459 ± 12 0.236 ± 0.11 −25.8 ± 0.9 ND NA

Data represents mean ± SD, n = 3.

*

ND = Gem was not detected