Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Sage Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):10.1177/2158244018824461. doi: 10.1177/2158244018824461

Table 1.

Strategies for Assuring Rigor of the Case Study Design

Confirmability—freedom from unrecognized researcher biases
  • Meeting with research team members to review data collection and analysis procedures
  • Review of data collection and analysis by team members to assess for study biases
  • Research team member continuously ensure that rival hypotheses or conclusions are considered
Dependability—the process of the study is consistent across researchers and settings
  • Case study protocols were used to ensure comparable procedures by data collectors and analyzers
  • Code book used to provide for consistency across data analyzers
  • Coding checks to assess level of agreement; disagreements were resolved through discussion
  • An audit trail was established
  • Investigators assessed connectedness of the study to the guiding conceptual framework.
Credibility—authenticity and plausibility, or truth value of the results
  • Analysis triangulation between multiple forms of data to strengthen inferences
  • Findings compared with current adaptive leadership literature
Transferability—usefulness beyond the individual participants in the study
  • Rich detail of data to facilitate comparison of findings in other contexts
  • Explicit criteria for the case selection provides for comparisons with other samples
  • Rich descriptions in the data to facilitate judgments about potential transferability