Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 3.

Published in final edited form as: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Dec 27;4(5):423–433. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.12.008

Table 1.

Participants’ Demographic Information

	Group			Statistic	Significance (p)
	TD	PS	LPS	Statistic	Significance (p)
Age, Years, Mean ± SD	15.75 ± 3.36	15.83 ± 2.89	15.32 ± 3.13	F_2,706 = 0.371	.690
TD vs. PS				t_1,668 = −0.28	.784
TD vs. LPS				t_1,534 = 0.75	.454
PS vs. LPS				t_1,206 = 0.95	.342
Number (% Female)	499 (49.1%)	171 (53.2%)	37 (37.8%)	χ²_2,707 = 2.99	.224
TD vs. PS				χ²_1,670 = 0.864	.353
TD vs. LPS				χ²_1,536 = 1.75	.186
PS vs. LPS				χ²_1,208 = 2.88	.09
GAF, Mean ± SD	79.81 ± 21.07	69.22 ± 19.7	73.22 ± 15.86	F_2,654 = 16.14	1.44 × 10⁻⁷
TD vs. PS				t_1,623 = 5.53	4.8 × 10⁻⁸
TD vs. LPS				t_1,499 = 1.74	.083
PS vs. LPS				t_1,186 = −1.079	.282
Education, Years, Mean ± SD	8.61 ± 3.27	8.13 ± 2.64	8.08 ± 3.06	F_2,704= 1.797	.167
TD vs. PS				t_1,668 = 1.73	.084
TD vs. LPS				t_1,534 = 0.949	.343
PS vs. LPS				t_1,206 = 0.952	.342

GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning Score; LPS, limited psychosis spectrum; PS, psychosis spectrum; TD, typically developing.